Preview
Issue #1
“Your IV may only have one block of related articles at the end of the page. If the source has several blocks, merge them together or choose which one to keep.”
- Accepted by admin
- Deleted Account
- https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-3-2-1-formatting-related-articles
<<
“Inline” blocks
You may leave “inline” related links in the middle the article. If you do, these <related> blocks must not have headers (unless the header contains critical information)."
>>
With all due respect, I believe the author of the issue has misguided admin by presenting an "inline" link as a separate block of related articles:
https://i.imgur.com/uIcivok.png
"Inline" related links are marked in green on the screenshot and my template handles all 3 of them. We cannot base the decision of removing related links on the mere fact of them being positioned at the end of an article. Leaving 2 out of 3 of the "inline" links seems like a cop-out.
P.S.
If this kind of links has no value to you then please say so in the Checklist, since it's safer for contestants to always remove them altogether. Otherwise the rule will be misused in similar situations and time of both contestants and admins will be wasted.
- Declined by admin
- Ah okay, yes, the related link is actually an inline related link (but around the end of the article).
- Type of issue
- Rudimentary content not removed
- Reported
- Mar 24, 2019