Preview
Issue #3
I'm afraid datetime here is still wrong, we should avoid parsing it when there's no year presented since we already get a lot of issues regarding the wrong date.
- AV
- Datetime is correct, correspondent time zone was applied here, that is why the time looks different in the preview.
- Declined by admin
- Accepted by admin
- Date is critically wrong. It's acceptable to not display the date, if it's not possible to extract the correct one
- AV
- Kindly asking to clarify, what exactly is wrong with the date? It is 6 Feb of current year (which is clear from the url), the time corresponds to the timezone of the website, which is UTC +11
- Declined by admin
- Sorry for the inconvenience. In this case the date extracted properly.
- Type of issue
- IV page is missing essential content
- Reported
- Feb 17, 2019