Em, why didn't you follow the admin decision (https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/crowdfundinsider.com/template23/issue2/) and remove the widget? Well, admin wrote about "Social buttons", but you haven't removed even the "Click to Tweet" button, and in fact, this whole block is one social button (class="essb-click-to-tweet"), keeping the citation with twitter mentions and hashtags ("@blockportio @tokeny #crypto") makes no sense (as you rightly wrote yourself). Admin didn't write the whole of that, but I guess they just didn't think all of it.
This citation functions like share widgets which should be removed. It citation repeats a part of the article (reminding a pull quote in that), but it is there only to show what you will be tweeting, it doesn't have any independent role in the article.
Log in here to create Instant View templates. Please enter your phone number in the international format and we will send a confirmation message to your account via Telegram.
Em, why didn't you follow the admin decision (https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/crowdfundinsider.com/template23/issue2/) and remove the widget? Well, admin wrote about "Social buttons", but you haven't removed even the "Click to Tweet" button, and in fact, this whole block is one social button (class="essb-click-to-tweet"), keeping the citation with twitter mentions and hashtags ("@blockportio @tokeny #crypto") makes no sense (as you rightly wrote yourself). Admin didn't write the whole of that, but I guess they just didn't think all of it.
This citation functions like share widgets which should be removed. It citation repeats a part of the article (reminding a pull quote in that), but it is there only to show what you will be tweeting, it doesn't have any independent role in the article.
The same story was on the domain wersm.com (example page: https://wersm.com/12-questions-with-nate-goldman/), where all participants removed that widget and it was considered OK by admins.