Preview
Issue #2
- Sherali Rysbekov
- The only thing I found in docs regarding reference is:
"<reference> with the attribute name that contains the reference name"
Checklist says nothing about it. I thus suppose it is not said anywhere that we should mark sources as reference, so I disagree with you
- Accepted by admin
- Indeed in this case <reference> should be used.
<reference> works the same the same way as <anchor> does, except you need to put the reference content inside of it. You can see how it works in the Wikipedia's Instant View
- Sherali Rysbekov
- Don't you think this should be documented in the Instant View Manual? Let me remind you, the only thing present in the docs regarding <reference> is its definition. Even if I can deduce by myself that it can be used, is there anything in the checklist stating that it "should" be used, or that it is obligatory to format references as <reference>? Is Wikipedia's IV included in the "Sample Templates" section? I don't need to tell you the answer to those questions. I am quite disappointed by such amount of idiocracy and implicit rules that are present. Very, very sad.
- Accepted by admin
- Type of issue
- IV page is missing essential content
- Reported
- Feb 24, 2019
Check <reference> tags in the manual.