- Sergey Pomogaylenko
- It's too overly. We have obviously place for author beneath the title between date and comments, and, yes, now we have there only sitename. But you just find rare case when in beginning of the article there is original author pointed in free form and want to say that it will be practical? In this site case it's more source than author. Besides, you provides extracting author only in this article, but there are more other variants. They all unique, it's just part of article content.
F.e. find author here (https://digitalinasia.com/2017/11/28/why-korea-is-saying-no-to-programmatic/) or here (https://digitalinasia.com/2017/12/01/new-tech-heats-up-apac-ecommerce-market/
) or even here (https://digitalinasia.com/2017/12/07/mobile-app-predictions-for-2018/) and so on to infinity. And try not to extract something wrong when you will provide every unique case. And whatever they identify themselves like Digital In Asia (f.e. DIA here in dialogue: https://digitalinasia.com/2018/11/02/how-blockchain-and-cryptocurrencies
- Declined by admin
- There is a dedicated field for the author. If the site does not use it, but writes the author in the article's body, it's not the template author's fault, if the "wrong" author will be set.
- Type of issue
- IV page is missing essential content
- Feb 16 at 12:54 AM