The Instant View Editor uses a three-column layout, so you really want to use it on a desktop screen that's wide enough. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Back to the main page »

Original

Preview

Link Preview

Issue #1

dot
Videos on this site are not embeds that loads with the article, they are being linked. There is no point of marking them unsupported. There are plenty of articles like this, when we could easily provide a link to those videos without losing that content, that way we match design of the site as well as we keep this totally fine, long article with optional videos.

Also, here's Admin's decision about it:
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/economictimes.indiatimes.com/template181/issue1/

Link should be kept.
View link in dot's template
Nisarg Jhaveri
https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-4-2-video-audio-from-unsupported-players
"..., it is `acceptable` to include a link to the video instead of unsupporting the article"

What I understand from it is that it is "acceptable" if you put a link and make the page available, but it is still okay if the entire page is unsupported. Because after all the page with links is not really the same as the page with video.

For example, for this page in template #218, the link for second video is taken out from `data-title` attribute and is not available anywhere in the source page. In a way, it should be considered "Author added their own content"!

I believe this is not an valid issue.
Declined by admin
It's acceptable to preserve a link, but not obligatory.
Note that issue was only about formatting
Type of issue
IV not generated for target page
Reported
Mar 31, 2019