ADMIN: Propose to reconsider the decision about preserving the author's picture based on these points:
1. It is located in the body of an article meaning that the author wanted it there. And it makes sense considering the fact that an author talks about herself in an article.
2. Rudimentary content here is the SECOND picture of an author (also highlighted) which traditionally goes after an article. Repetition of the picture justifies that author wants it to be there.
3. Obviously, changing the author's actual work would be illegal.
Got my previous template rejected for the same issue, so it is a non-issue for me.
Declined by admin
Type of issue
IV page is missing essential content
Reported
Jun 16, 2017
Log In
Log in here to create Instant View templates. Please enter your phone number in the international format and we will send a confirmation message to your account via Telegram.
1. It is located in the body of an article meaning that the author wanted it there. And it makes sense considering the fact that an author talks about herself in an article.
2. Rudimentary content here is the SECOND picture of an author (also highlighted) which traditionally goes after an article. Repetition of the picture justifies that author wants it to be there.
3. Obviously, changing the author's actual work would be illegal.