Preview
Issue #1
this links must wrap with related look other template it is possible
- Den S.
- I stopped supporting this type of links in my template, because of the new rules:
"There are cases when you must not use RelatedArticles:
1. Keep but don’t format as Related
Links that can’t be safely and reliably extracted from the article text."
And I think it is a right thing. It is a nightmare to support all type of these links. None of them have classes. Some of them are in a list, some are not. And the only identifiable thing - one word - has like 5 (or more) variations. Also it can be in <strong> or in plain text.
Something may break, either now or in the future.
Anyway, if this issues gets accepted, then, I assume, it will be valid to report all cases of related links like that from >2015. Although this site is 2 years old, let's think about it in an abstract way. I think if related articles are not consistently in the same block with a class/id or at least don't consistently have one (!) identifying word, then they shouldn't be taken care of.
- Declined by admin
- Type of issue
- IV page is missing essential content
- Reported
- Mar 23, 2019