Processed Issues
This page shows a list of issues for fortune.com that were approved or declined by our admins.
|
Template #4
|
Issue #1
Jun 17, 2017
|
- Accepted by admin
|
|
Template #5
|
Issue #1
Jun 17, 2017
|
- chuchu
- That's not advert
- Declined by admin
- Agree with creator.
|
|
Template #5
|
Issue #2
Jun 18, 2017
|
- chuchu
- Admin please review this issue for another template:
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/watson.ch/template11/issue2/
I think it's accepted by mistake. On source page it's fb post embed. And manual says posts are supported. So it should display correctly when facebook posts will be displayed in IV. There is no clarifications in manual that I should make video embed out of post embed. So it is not on my side
- Accepted by admin
- We did.
|
|
Template #5
|
Issue #3
Jun 19, 2017
|
- chuchu
- Sorry again, I should add some clarifications from my side about this issue:
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/meduza.io/template144/issue1/
1. Generally this badge is important for list view. When you scroll down the list of news you can't see content, you only see the headline and meta. In this case this badge is important because no other content.
2. Other news media have not such badges, but does that mean that all information is confirmed? No, all sources (reliable or not) are presented in the article, it is the must. And articles have information about confirmed it or not. And so in meduza.io
3. As you say: "This block indicates..". Indicates, but not determinds. The article content determinate which badge will be used and not vice versa. And of course all essential content is presented in the article. It is like category, topic or tag. They are indicate too but they are not essential on article page.
That mean this badge relevant generally for list view of news, but it is not essential on a
- Accepted by admin
- The main thing now is 'Since there’s a template that supports it better'..
- chuchu
- Okay, wanted to win because reporters template misses way more important things
#supports it better
Why this issue is not accepted if my template supports it better?
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/drive.ru/template21/issue1/
I don't get it. What does "handles the page perfectly" mean? It is table, it can't be supported perfectly because it is not table anymore in IV
And one more please:
https://buzzfeed.com/shylawatson/robin-wright-is-set-to-return-in-the-justice-league
There is 4 paragraphs, they should not be in figcaption. For example on asos.com some pages have all content in figcaption, but it does not mean that it should be in figcaption in IV, because it's used only for some program/design purpose and displayed as ordinary content on source page
Thanks
- Accepted by admin
- Supporting it perfectly means that e.g. no three column tables should be shown in IV - It's also okay to not generate IV for two column tables if essential information would be lost and there is no other (perfect) way to work around it.
Your template tried to handle three column tables which shouldn't be done: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/drive.ru/template22/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.drive.ru%2Fnews%2F4efb32da00f11713001e281c.html
The issue you mentioned (template 21, issue 1) could be improved - but it wouldn't really look perfect aswell when e.g. showing the table as a list.
Regarding the 4 paragraphs you mentioned: They are in the figcaption property. There is no way for a template creator to check if this was intended by the article creator or not. Hence this behaviour is legitimate.
|