Preview
Issue #2
This is a dynamic block of links. If you see the link in cached IV is not first anymore http://joxi.ru/n2YnGLkhbk8VgA so its must be removed
- Tagir
- According to rules:
"Related articles:
Are thematically related to the current article.
May also be located on a different website.
Lists of related articles are (relatively) static (a news item may eventually get an extra link to the newest piece on the topic, but this just adds another item to an otherwise static list)"
Which is exactly this block. It is thematically related, relatively static block of links, when occasionally authors would add a new link. It is as static as "More on this topic" ("ΠΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ") block below.
What you show there on screenshot is a misunderstanding.
Take a closer look, please. The first link in the IV is a link taken from header of the block. Therefore, all the links have index i + 1, compared to the original. This is because the header of related block cannot be a link itself.
There is no restriction on whether related article leads to an IV page or not. In fact,
"We designed the RelatedArticles block to deliver a better IV-reading experience to the users. The IV eng
- Accepted by admin
- "Related articles:
...
Lists of related articles are (relatively) static (a news item may eventually get an extra link to the newest piece on the topic, but this just adds another item to an otherwise static list)" means that links themselves are list.
In this case these links lead to dynamic pages, that won't generate IV. There's no sense to format the block as related.
- Tagir
- There is only one link in the block, which leads to a dynamic list. Others lead to an article. If that's the problem, you totally failed to make it clear.
- Declined by admin
- Type of issue
- Rudimentary content not removed
- Reported
- Feb 19, 2019