The Instant View Editor uses a three-column layout, so you really want to use it on a desktop screen that's wide enough. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Back to the main page »



Link Preview

Issue #3

No, you are wrong here (, and admin is wrong too this time (don't know why) here (

1) It is obligatory when related articles are (relatively) static (a news item may eventually get an extra link to the newest piece on the topic, but this just adds another item to an otherwise static list).
2) Other types of “More” links that are not suitable for the “Related articles” block should be removed... Examples: ...Dynamic lists of “Latest articles from this category”
1) - is not this case, this case is 2) exactly
Sam Chen
If you check the html code, the `div` has a class `related-posts`. Also, have you ever write any CMS, you might render the related posts randomly, since one post could have many related posts, and you just want to show only some of them for one time.
Declined by admin

The two relevant parts of the text:

1) - Other “More" links are identifiable and not either removed or formatted as “Related articles”.

2) We will not accept issues on whether or not links formatted as “Related articles” are thematically related enough or static enough.

So in this case, the links are handled with IV 2.0 formatting. So this is okay.
Type of issue
Rudimentary content not removed
Feb 9, 2019