Processed Issues11

This page shows a list of issues for kianews24.ru that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #2 Issue #1
Feb 10, 2019
This URL from one of the "Top News" ("Топ новости") requires an Instant View page
Amin
the page has an iframe which is not currently supported by IV
Accepted by admin
Declined by admin
Duplicate
Template #2 Issue #2
Feb 10, 2019
This article obviously needs IV page
Amin
the page obviously contains some iframes which are not supported and you deleted them in your template, but those iframes are part of main article
Accepted by admin
Template #2 Issue #3
Feb 12, 2019
IV needed.
Accepted by admin
Template #10 Issue #1
Feb 14, 2019
IV needed.
Accepted by admin
Template #8 Issue #1
Feb 14, 2019
Missing line breaks.
Amin
this exactly matches with the source article
Declined by admin
Template #8 Issue #2
Feb 14, 2019
IV needed.
Accepted by admin
Template #10 Issue #2
Feb 14, 2019
there were two youtube-video in the article
Accepted by admin
Template #7 Issue #1
Feb 14, 2019
Mostly not an issue but it is interesting to know what real difference between image (<img>) and icon (<pic>) to understand how we may use a <pic> and how we may not.
If we show in template image like <img> we see that IV page use not better quality (like says checklist) but some kind of optimal quality for current frame (or screen).
And if somebody uses <pic> with @width instead of <img> for big images, he get really original image quality (if @width had original width value at first).
For this article in this template we see that <pic> saves original @width=1280. But if we do <img>, my notebook gets smaller images. But (!) shown link to images identical in both cases.
Besides manual says that "Icon" is a small image inside the text (f.e.emoji) and in checklist we can see only "risk grabbing the 3x version of an emoji".
So, question is: may we or not (like in this template) to transform real images (not inside the texp) to icons (<pic>) with no special reasons for it?
And if we may, at least what will be bet
Accepted by admin
<pic> shouldn't be used for regular images that can be displayed as <img>
Template #18 Issue #1
Feb 17, 2019
comment section, footer
Accepted by admin
Template #22 Issue #1
Feb 19, 2019
Strong style is missing.
Amin
the text and the pic are inside an em which is inside a strong!
although this is really a rare scenario, there is nothing wrong about styling here based on the checklist
Declined by admin
Template #22 Issue #2
Feb 20, 2019
Should be removed.
Amin
no it's part of the content(look at some other pages and you won't see this )
Declined by admin