Contest - Instant View

Processed Issues38

This page shows a list of issues for leganerd.com that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #1 Сергей Герасимов	Issue #1 Jun 9, 2017	𝕄аксим image that duplicates video Accepted by admin methyrr did it better: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/leganerd.com/template3/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fleganerd.com%2F2015%2F01%2F19%2Fsnoppen-och-snippan%2F
Template #3 𝕄аксим	Issue #1 Jun 16, 2017	Sergio this is a figcaption Accepted by admin Koichirose's template handles it better: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/leganerd.com/template4/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fleganerd.com%2F2017%2F04%2F24%2Fretropie-guida-alle-funzionalita-avanzate%2F
Template #7 𝕄аксим	Issue #1 Jun 16, 2017	Sergio this is a cover Declined by admin Covers are optional (if they are no cover in the source). This image is no cover in the source article.
Template #8 Сергей Герасимов	Issue #1 Jun 16, 2017	Sergio these are pullquotes, not blockquotes Accepted by admin
Template #8 Сергей Герасимов	Issue #2 Jun 16, 2017	Sergio this is a pullquote in the original article Accepted by admin
Template #10 Deleted Account	Issue #1 Jun 17, 2017	Sergio cover is wrong Accepted by admin
Template #11 Сергей Герасимов	Issue #1 Jun 17, 2017	Sergio this is a "spoiler-like" section, this has to be removed Accepted by admin
Template #11 Сергей Герасимов	Issue #2 Jun 17, 2017	𝕄аксим Spoilers on page require interaction and losing meaning without it, as it said in https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/knife.media/template9/issue2/ IV shouldn't be generated for articles with such elements Accepted by admin
Template #9 Sergio	Issue #2 Jun 18, 2017	𝕄аксим rudimentary nsfw spoiler link Accepted by admin
Template #10 Deleted Account	Issue #4 Jun 18, 2017	𝕄аксим missing gallery Accepted by admin
Template #11 Сергей Герасимов	Issue #3 Jun 18, 2017	𝕄аксим nsfw spoiler link Accepted by admin
Template #11 Сергей Герасимов	Issue #4 Jun 18, 2017	𝕄аксим gallery images can be bigger Accepted by admin
Template #13 𝕄аксим	Issue #1 Jun 19, 2017	Sergio this is an image caption Accepted by admin
Template #15 Francesco	Issue #1 Feb 5, 2019	Marco Bowl Missing content Accepted by admin
Template #23 Giovanni M.	Issue #1 Feb 5, 2019	Francesco Author url is missing Giovanni M. Checklist 6.3.5: Author links are optional. Declined by admin
Template #22 Marco Bowl	Issue #1 Feb 5, 2019	Ajeje Brazorf hashtag not removed from title Accepted by admin
Template #22 Marco Bowl	Issue #2 Feb 6, 2019	Ajeje Brazorf part of the text is missing Accepted by admin
Template #23 Giovanni M.	Issue #2 Feb 6, 2019	Ajeje Brazorf missing photo Giovanni M. It's a strange behavior of the new IV engine. Sometimes an URL is shown in place of the images. Scroll down to find it. Declined by admin
Template #26 Francesco	Issue #1 Feb 6, 2019	Ajeje Brazorf missing photo Francesco The image is there, there is an issue about fetching it Declined by admin
Template #27 Sergio	Issue #1 Feb 6, 2019	Ajeje Brazorf missing photo Sergio the image is there, telegram is having issues fetching it, apparently Declined by admin
Template #23 Giovanni M.	Issue #3 Feb 8, 2019	admin This text should be formatted as a pullquote Accepted by admin
Template #26 Francesco	Issue #2 Feb 8, 2019	admin This text should be formatted as a pullquote Accepted by admin
Template #27 Sergio	Issue #2 Feb 8, 2019	admin This text should be formatted as a pullquote Accepted by admin
Template #34 Giovanni M.	Issue #1 Feb 9, 2019	Falko Must be formatted as <related>, not <blockquote> (according to 6.3.2). Giovanni M. I disagree, author wants that related article there. If you put it in a <related> tag and there's no IV for it, the reader can miss an essential content. In my opinion, RelatedArticles blocks are better suited for 'read also' sections at the end of the page. I thinks that 6.3.2 needs further clarifications. Declined by admin
Template #34 Giovanni M.	Issue #2 Feb 9, 2019	Amin these links point to the author's other articles and I think there should be <related> not quote Giovanni M. DUPLICATED ISSUE I disagree, author wants that related article there. If you put it in a <related> tag and there's no IV for it, the reader can miss an essential content. In my opinion, RelatedArticles blocks are better suited for 'read also' sections at the end of the page. I think that 6.3.2 needs further clarifications. Declined by admin
Template #37 Amin	Issue #1 Feb 9, 2019	Francesco This image links to Amazon.it. This link has to be kept and the image must have href attribute Declined by admin Not critical in this case
Template #34 Giovanni M.	Issue #3 Feb 9, 2019	Falko Image caption incomplete Accepted by admin
Template #37 Amin	Issue #2 Feb 9, 2019	Falko Missing <related> title Amin There is no related title in article, it is a standalone link which covered correctly Declined by admin
Template #44 Giovanni M.	Issue #1 Feb 10, 2019	Francesco Related articles must be handled with the <related> tag Giovanni M. I disagree in the specific case. I'm waiting admins decision about this. Please, read: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/leganerd.com/template37/issue3/ https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/leganerd.com/template39/issue2/ Declined by admin
Template #37 Amin	Issue #3 Feb 10, 2019	Giovanni M. I think it's wrong to use <related> blocks this way. The author refers to this precise list of articles in the text above (that is, each element of the list is essential for him). IV may not be available for some pages and as a result the associated page may disappear from these <related> blocks. Therefore the reader can miss essential contents. Accepted by admin
Template #45 Francesco	Issue #1 Feb 10, 2019	A. NSFW material Declined by admin There is no rule that NSFW content must be removed. IV should be generated regardless of the content (SFW/NSFW)
Template #45 Francesco	Issue #2 Feb 12, 2019	Giovanni M. My template can support this page Accepted by admin
Template #46 Giovanni M.	Issue #1 Feb 14, 2019	Falko Blockquote source not <cite>d correctly Giovanni M. It's a <p> tag with text right aligned followed by a blockquote. There no other class, id, etc. to reliable identify this as blockquote+cite. I think the approach you follow in your template can lead to unpredictable behaviors. Declined by admin
Template #46 Giovanni M.	Issue #2 Feb 14, 2019	Falko Very sorry to make this a duplicate of the previous issue, but I have no other way to reply. It is possible to reliably identify the quote author by looking at the next-sibling of the blockquote, then checking whether it is aligned to the right. Any text directly below the quote and aligned to the right will always necessarily be the source, so it's identifiable and will not lead to unpredictable behavior. Giovanni M. I still think that your approach is not valid in a general sense. You can match this specific case, but what about <blockquote> followed by <span>, <blockquote> followed by <em>, etc.? When writers format text neglecting html semantics, it is not possible to predict all the combinations to obtain correctly cited blockquotes. Moreover this kind of "issue" does not seem to me so relevant. All essential contents are preserved and the reader will find the source under the quoted text, just as the writer wanted. Declined by admin
Template #46 Giovanni M.	Issue #3 Feb 15, 2019	admin This link should be wrapped in <related> Accepted by admin Giovanni M. Although this blocks are easily identifiable in the source they are not random or dynamic. They are inserted by the writers by hand and are frequently referred in the text above. Wrapping this blocks with <related> tag can lead to loss of essential content. This is a good example, with explanations: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/leganerd.com/template51/issue2/ Admins agreed with me here: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/leganerd.com/template37/issue3/ Declined by admin I see. Thank you for clarifications!
Template #61 Giovanni M.	Issue #1 Feb 18, 2019	Francesco These links to Amazon should be kept in the article, since they are essential content. Giovanni M. This article is about Robin Hobb and some of her books. There's no direct reference to the content of this Amazon's widget in the text. According to the checklist any non-essential widget should be removed. Furthermore they are dynamic. Declined by admin
Template #61 Giovanni M.	Issue #2 Feb 19, 2019	Francesco There are a lot of empty paragraphs Giovanni M. The author put them there. We are not supposed to modify the source. Declined by admin
Template #61 Giovanni M.	Issue #3 Mar 31, 2020	Marco 😁 Giovanni M. No issue Declined by admin

Processed Issues38

Log In