The 2019 Instant View contest is over. View results
The Instant View Editor uses a three-column layout, so you really want to use it on a desktop screen that's wide enough. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Back to the main page »

Original

Preview

Link Preview

Issue #1

This website uses this field only as the "cite" of the caption of the image. It should be presented in <cite> tags. Check all the similar pages, all of them use it as the <cite>. It is technically possible to reliably identify these credit texts.

"IV 2.0 supports a dedicated <cite> tag for credits in media captions. Credits in captions must be preserved and placed inside the appropriate tag, provided it is technically possible to reliably identify them."
Amir
I can't do a risk like that, and no one is able to check all the articles to see that they use this pattern all the time or not, and declare that part as <cite> is very illogical. what if in just one article they put a text as the caption in that tag?? in that case, the caption will be set as credit and this is wrong.
Declined by admin
Type of issue
IV page is missing essential content
Reported
Mar 7, 2019 at 9:25 PM