The Instant View Editor uses a three-column layout, so you really want to use it on a desktop screen that's wide enough. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Back to the main page »

Original

Preview

Link Preview

Issue #2

admin
It doesn't have to work in "most cases", it must work on any possible article with any possible input.

I may endlessly find N+1 articles, for which the removal method will break something or work unstable, but you miss the point: even if we create a template with exception rules for absolutely all articles existing on N+1 right now, you can never guess how article editor will decide to style this bottom paragraph or what information to put in it upon publishing in future articles. I consider leaving this signature as-is better than:
- Removing signature for most articles, but leaving them for a few or several ones, because article author styled something differently
- Removing signatures that used in context (sometimes there's a text below or above signature that refers or looks broken without it)
- Removing signature that contain extra information about how article was created

If we would talk about rudimentary website block that contains an extra information, it would be OK, but it's just a text that edit
Declined by admin
It is acceptable to keep this text, extra hooks to remove it won't work for all pages anyway and may lead to issues on other pages.
Type of issue
Rudimentary content not removed
Reported
May 26, 2017