Preview
Issue #2
- admin
- It doesn't have to work in "most cases", it must work on any possible article with any possible input.
I may endlessly find N+1 articles, for which the removal method will break something or work unstable, but you miss the point: even if we create a template with exception rules for absolutely all articles existing on N+1 right now, you can never guess how article editor will decide to style this bottom paragraph or what information to put in it upon publishing in future articles. I consider leaving this signature as-is better than:
- Removing signature for most articles, but leaving them for a few or several ones, because article author styled something differently
- Removing signatures that used in context (sometimes there's a text below or above signature that refers or looks broken without it)
- Removing signature that contain extra information about how article was created
If we would talk about rudimentary website block that contains an extra information, it would be OK, but it's just a text that edit
- Declined by admin
- It is acceptable to keep this text, extra hooks to remove it won't work for all pages anyway and may lead to issues on other pages.
- Type of issue
- Rudimentary content not removed
- Reported
- May 26, 2017
In most cases, this problem is solved without using a hardcode.
Look to my templates
for this page: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/nplus1.ru/template23/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnplus1.ru%2Fmaterial%2F2017%2F05%2F03%2FBEZDNA
and other
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/nplus1.ru/template23/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnplus1.ru%2Fnews%2F2017%2F05%2F22%2FAustralia-earliest-site