Preview
Issue #1
this block must be tagged as related, loot at my template
- Falko
- This is not reliably identifiable as specified in 1.3.2: It is an unordered list where neither the <ul>, the <li>, or the <a> inside it have any tags at all.
In your template, this is tagged as <related> (maybe by detecting any links inside a top-level list), but the text is missing. This implies that any article with a list of links that are *not* related will not only be incorrectly tagged as a related block, but the text will also be missing.
So I think it is best to have this as it is in the source page, as a list with links inside of it, so no information gets lost.
- Declined by admin
- This is not a "clearly identifyable" related article. It's part of a content in a <ul> tag. While it can be marked as related, it's fine to keep it. Otherwise it might lead to issues with important links marked as related and hence breaking the article structure.
- Type of issue
- IV page is missing essential content
- Reported
- Feb 8, 2019