Preview
Issue #1
- Mikhail Burkasov
- This is an extremely old article 12 years old. I don't see anything crucially wrong with my template.
1. In the original article, every link has its own header and there is no reason to combine them just because they are the same. Clearly, optional, in my opinion.
2. There is no way to determine the type of the link, besides the word Stem, but even IF
a) This article is unrelated - it is a "More" element - and it is still formatted as related, which is fine by the checklist.
b) The link will not be generated (not considering that no links work anymore in 12yo article) it is still acceptable according to
6.4.3 Auxiliary widgets
Some pages include unsupported widgets that are not essential for the understanding of the article. A local news site may show a weather forecast widget on their pages. A business newspaper may show a stock price ticker for the companies covered in the article. Some websites include “And what would you do?” VOTES at the end of some of their articles to increase user engagement.
So it i
- Declined by admin
- Type of issue
- IV page is missing essential content
- Reported
- Mar 11, 2019
STEM HER: ... - Do not belong to related articles. There may be a link to the vote associated with the article.