Preview
Issue #1
- arseny m
- This >> is the only formatting that makes it possible to distinguish such links from other paragraphs. I don't want to risk. I've seen some links without >>, I've seen links without <strong>. How am I supposed to reliably detect them? If they had at least a "related" class, I would agree, but they don't.
Moreover, I've checked quite a lot of pages on this website and found out that these links lead to pages with dynamic content more often then the formatted ones.
- Type of issue
- IV page is missing essential content
- Reported
- Mar 15, 2019
Related articles both exist in the source and are identifiable but were not formatted as IV 2.0 "Related articles”.
https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-3-2-related-articles