The Instant View Editor uses a three-column layout, so you really want to use it on a desktop screen that's wide enough. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Back to the main page »

Original

Preview

Link Preview

Issue #1

Hey
I forgot why I made this <related> and then <details>, but now back to <related>.
Seems like there can't be any essential links in here and that block should be formatted as <related>

Can't find any other issues tho
Ilya Borovik
Hi!
"Further Reading" and "Citations" blocks not necessarily contain articles from sciencenews.org but references to other websites and scientific articles.

On this page all links in "Further Reading" are from sciencenews.org. Here are few examples where "Further Reading" links point to external resources:
1) https://www.sciencenews.org/article/periodic-table-history-chemical-elements-150-anniversary
2) https://www.sciencenews.org/article/bering-sea-ice-disappearing-arctic-ecosystems
3) https://www.sciencenews.org/article/vitamin-d-supplements-do-not-prevent-heart-disease-or-cancer
4) https://www.sciencenews.org/article/counting-breaths-wild-porpoises-reveals-their-revved-metabolism

In most cases, these external websites do not have IV and thus links will no be shown inside <related> in IV.

Also, "Further Reading" items often contain additional information like volume, page in journal that will disappear inside <related>

So I think we should leave them as text. <details> fits pretty well here.
Declined by admin
Acceptable formatting in this case.
Type of issue
IV page is missing essential content
Reported
Mar 24, 2019