Preview
Issue #3
- Deleted Account
- it is optional.
Please see this issue which was declined by admins
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/lamianow.gr/template1/issue4/
Also checklist said that
If conflicting dates are stored in multiple places on the source page, preference should be given to the time that is visible to the ordinary user who views the page in a browser.
- Declined by admin
- Dario, thank you for the explanation of you position. It's also correct, but handling of timezone is optional and up to the template creator.
- Type of issue
- IV page is missing essential content
- Reported
- Feb 13, 2019
The article metadata contains two conflicting times:
08:28:14 UTC+2 (06:28:14 UTC) resulting from either:
//meta[@itemprop="datePublished"]/@content
or:
//time[@itemprop="datePublished"]/@datetime
10:28:14 UTC+2 (08:28:14 UTC) obtained via:
//meta[@property="article:published_time"]/@content
Issue #1 of template #11 explains why the latter is the correct one.
Then this template shows 10:28 UTC, that was even yet to pass as I started writing this. But I don't think they used a time machine.
"If conflicting dates are stored in multiple places on the source page, preference should be given to the time that is visible to the ordinary user who views the page in a browser."
Yes, the time that is visible to the user is 10:28. But it is obviously displayed according to the Greek timezone. Therefore, when shown in the IV preview (always UTC) it should read 08:28. Remember that "It is possible for a perfect template to dis