Processed Issues46

This page shows a list of issues for techzine.be that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #2 Issue #1
Feb 5, 2019
Shows empty paragraphs
Declined by admin
Template #3 Issue #1
Feb 5, 2019
should be removed
Declined by admin
In IV for multi-page articles the page navigation should be preserved or IV should display the full article
Template #3 Issue #2
Feb 5, 2019
should be removed
Declined by admin
Duplicated issue
Template #6 Issue #1
Feb 5, 2019
No Instant View available
Accepted by admin
Template #5 Issue #1
Feb 7, 2019
This web page is separated into multi pages, and those are important links to next pages. Should not get removed.
Accepted by admin
Template #2 Issue #2
Feb 7, 2019
IV needed.
Accepted by admin
Template #5 Issue #2
Feb 7, 2019
link break is missing.
Accepted by admin
Template #3 Issue #3
Feb 7, 2019
Missing contents.
Accepted by admin
Template #8 Issue #1
Feb 9, 2019
6.3.2 Related articles
IV 2.0 supports a dedicated type for RelatedArticles.

It is obligatory to format “Related articles” links using the new <related> tag, provided they are identifiable in the source. Related Articles:
Accepted by admin
Template #11 Issue #1
Feb 9, 2019
We should avoid generating IV for this page since without the color, you have no idea what is it with those numbers.
Accepted by admin
There's no need to unsupport the whole page because of the rating graphics. It's enough to format it differently
Template #13 Issue #1
Feb 10, 2019
This content doesn't make any sense because it seems like an element of the navigation through the article but is not actually are. Also as I mentioned "Niet-IoT-specifiek", it's not easy to understand what it means(it may be understood that it's a page where you are). It's better to write "Volgende pagina: " as made in the original page.
Accepted by admin
Template #13 Issue #2
Feb 10, 2019
Why there is no IV page? We can easily make it. Even though there's a rating element with colors, it's easy to understand without them.
Accepted by admin
Template #18 Issue #1
Feb 11, 2019
Should be avoid.
Sergey
Why should it be avoided? I showed all the essential content and it easy to understand everything even without colors. I suppose you understand that if you have a 1 point out of 10 it's not very good and if you have 8 points out of 10 it's quite good.
Declined by admin
Template #20 Issue #1
Feb 12, 2019
Rudimentary content not removed
Saturn
You are interesting, now you define those as rudimentary? Those are important data!
Declined by admin
Template #20 Issue #2
Feb 12, 2019
Author link is not included when it is included in original link
Declined by admin
Author links are optional.
Template #20 Issue #3
Feb 12, 2019
It doesn't make any sense. In your implementation it means that it's one of the elements of the navigation through the article
Accepted by admin
Template #24 handles this case better. Unfortunately, the reporter's template doesn't provide a proper solution.
Template #20 Issue #4
Feb 12, 2019
1) Missed text "Volgende pagina: ", this translates as the next article and it makes sense because it is part of the navigation.
( why it's part of navigation https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/techzine.be/template5/issue1/)

2) "Inhoudsopgave" should be separate
Saturn
You are doing a lot of extra jobs, what if they change some layouts here? Your template would break.
Accepted by admin
The reporter's template handles this case better.
Template #22 Issue #1
Feb 12, 2019
1) Missed text "We lopen in wat volgt doorheen het diagram, gaan dieper in op de verschillende technologieën en kijken in hoeverre ze vandaag door de Belgische operatoren worden aangeboden."
2) "Volgende Pagina:" should be part of link as in original content
3) Missed "Inhoudsopgave"
4) The article may refer to other parts of the article and it is important to leave the numbering here.
Accepted by admin
The reporter's template handles this case better.
Template #25 Issue #1
Feb 12, 2019
Should not have IV page because it's contact page, lol.
Saturn
It's optional as long as it does not have any interactive fields.
Declined by admin
Template #25 Issue #2
Feb 12, 2019
Let's look same issues on another websites about contact pages. It's should not have IV page.
Declined by admin
Template #25 Issue #3
Feb 12, 2019
Should be removed, technically it's possible.
Declined by admin
Template #25 Issue #4
Feb 12, 2019
Should be removed also
Declined by admin
Template #25 Issue #5
Feb 12, 2019
Should be removed, technically it's possible and it's look better in my template.
Declined by admin
Template #25 Issue #6
Feb 12, 2019
Should be removed, technically it's possible and it's look better in my template.
Declined by admin
Template #34 Issue #1
Feb 15, 2019
Should be an IV page
Accepted by admin
Template #38 Issue #1
Feb 17, 2019
It's a related article, and it should be in a related tag. You might say that it can endanger content, but actually, it's not.
If you take look on the pages on this website, you'll find that they have a similar pattern all the time. And if you answer that it can endanger content, give a link, that my template doesn't handle. I've checked over 40 pages of this website and nowhere I had found any mistakes with my template.
Saturn
First thank u for report. But It's not my responsibility to give you a link or whatever, as you might already realize that it would take a long time to find such a case.

For me, it's a better way to do less to the original source, since the more you do, the more you're going to break. While you can't find a counter case doesn't mean you won't break something.

So let's wait for admin's decision here.
Declined by admin
Since the text can't be identified (simple paragraph), it's acceptable to leave it as it is
Template #38 Issue #2
Feb 17, 2019
Should be considered as a related article, but there are only five another related articles but without the most important.
Accepted by admin
Template #38 Issue #3
Feb 17, 2019
Should be deleted. And also, deletion is safety, you won't lose any content. If you write that it can be dangerous, then give a link where my template doesn't handle it.
Declined by admin
Not critical
Template #41 Issue #2
Feb 18, 2019
Since we're transforming those reviews page, it's better do something to make it better.
Alex
This does not interfere with the perception of simplified content.
Accepted by admin
Template #38 Issue #4
Feb 18, 2019
Missed "minuten", without it I can't understand what this this numbers mean
Declined by admin
It seems the reporter confused lists. There's one where is no minuten
Template #38 Issue #5
Feb 18, 2019
wrong translated word
Accepted by admin
Template #47 Issue #1
Feb 21, 2019
The photos can be shown properly as my template does, but it seems that you did something wrong with the source link.
Accepted by admin
Template #50 Issue #1
Feb 24, 2019
Should be supported :).
Saturn
Cool, now u find some articles with image inside table tell me I should support it.
Accepted by admin
Template #53 Issue #1
Feb 24, 2019
Missed content
Accepted by admin
Template #57 Issue #1
Feb 27, 2019
From what I learned from this issue https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/brodude.ru/template77/issue1/, this site_name should be `Techzine`, not `Techzine.be`.
Sergey
Is that so critical so that requires a template be rejected?
Accepted by admin
Not critical, but since the template has been declined, it would be better to set site name as "Techzine"
Template #59 Issue #1
Feb 27, 2019
Missed author
Saturn
Well, it's a link to a same web page on other site, actually I would consider it rudimentary we all should remove.
Declined by admin
Template #59 Issue #2
Feb 27, 2019
This site techzine.be but author techzine.nl
Saturn
No, techzine.nl is just a clone site of techzine.be, I don't know why they exists together, and it's obviously not a person's name.
Declined by admin
Duplicate of issue 1
Template #57 Issue #2
Feb 27, 2019
Duplicated.
Sergey
There are two images on the original page, look at the source. I don't think we should change it.
Accepted by admin
Second images has width=1 and height=1, so it's not visible in the original article. So it should be removed.
Template #57 Issue #3
Feb 27, 2019
Missed figcaptions, my template handle it fine
Sergey
The figcaptions are not identifiable here. They just go as "em" in the same block with an image, but it can be something else. It appears in another way almost on all pages. For example, https://www.techzine.be/blogs/29413/ar-voor-iedereen-aan-de-slag-met-nreals-comfortabele-budgethololens.html

https://www.techzine.be/blogs/28200/robotic-process-automation-je-nieuwe-assistent-is-een-bot.html

https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/techzine.be/template57?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.techzine.be%2Fblogs%2F27268%2Fiot-belgie-netwerk-landschap.html

or anywhere else.
Declined by admin
Template #59 Issue #3
Feb 27, 2019
Missed figcaptions, my template handle it fine
Saturn
You gotta kidding me, a em (figcaption) after br after noscript after p[@style="text-align: center"][img], and you combine them into figure??? Of course you can handle it fine in this case if you write some crazy xpath rules, but I don't think it make sense here. You are going to BREAK things.
Declined by admin
Not a figcaption. Sam chen explained it really great. It's optional to support these kind of "captions"
Template #59 Issue #4
Mar 2, 2019
should be obtained, but it seems that you did something to src
Accepted by admin
Template #61 Issue #1
Mar 2, 2019
Should be higher resolution, and it can be obtained, see my template.
I had the same issue here: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/citytraffic.ru/template13/issue4/
Alex
I set srcset for this, no idea why IV bot chose this resolution
Accepted by admin
Currently IV 2.0 doesn't support srcset.
Template #61 Issue #2
Mar 2, 2019
In those product reviews, benchmark runs against other similar products for comparing, so it's important to highlight where the reviewed product ranked in the benchmark result.

This template does not apply any style to highlight the reviewed item, that makes those benchmark results no easy for user to check.
Accepted by admin
Template #66 Issue #1
Mar 4, 2019
It should be a slideshow. It can be easily identified by class "images"
Saturn
Not really necessary, it's three images in a table.images.
Declined by admin
Template #66 Issue #2
Mar 4, 2019
should and can be obtained higher quality
Saturn
Oh, 1142x856 is not enough? Removing size info like '-1142x856' from url is not always a good idea, it's not reliable, sometimes you get broken link, and if you're lucky, you exclude it so nobody can find it and send you an issue, but it's still very dangerous.
Declined by admin
See: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/techzine.be/template66/issue3/
Template #66 Issue #3
Mar 5, 2019
I also had the same opinion about quality of the image, but look: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/citytraffic.ru/template13/issue4/ and my template doesn't lose any information
Saturn
I would love to share another story here https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/businessinsider.co.za/template100/issue1/.

On that site, we can't detect video without making request to third party server. So how could u win that template? Easy, just fix all those video lost articles someone reported, no one has that time to find them all, then u just win that template. But the problem is still there. Removing size info from url is dangerous, we all know it. We need a balance here, if the cover is not that small (in this page 1142x856), it would be all right, unless you're ready taking the risk of losing cover.
Declined by admin
In this case 1142x856 is enough and not so critical as 460x450