Preview
Issue #2
- Deleted Account
- Putting image instead of video and calling it better? That's not cool anymore man cmoon. Users see solid video on original. It's obvious that your template can't give best IV experience.
And this video category is 1/20 part of the website
- Type of issue
- IV not generated for target page
- Reported
- Apr 18, 2019
On your template, many articles (every second or third) have no IV because of unsupported and unrelated video at the end of the article.
Marking it as "unsupported" isn't the best solution. Too many IVs are missing, that's bad.
Probably you will tell "not identifiable" etc, but you are wrong, as you can see all works perfectly, check articles with Telegraf video as many as you want. All works perfectly.
Examples:
https://telegra.ph/Articles-with-Telegraf-video-04-18
https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-4-2-video-audio-from-unsupported-players
"If an otherwise supported article includes a video or an audio track that would cause it to become unsupported, it is acceptable to include a link to the video instead of unsupporting the article. If there’s no other content on the page, it must not generate an IV."
Link to video is a much better solution than video tag with src (in this case IV also can't be g