Preview
Issue #1
- Gabriele Guerrisi
- Yea will wait for an admin to check the issues about the data modified :-)
Imho it's a content of the article. The IV does not provide a way to handle it so should not be removed/modified from the article.
The user can understand how much is updated the page from it. You don't have to see the specific case, since it's a news website and they update often their articles, with a variance not defined, maybe also day after. In general is a precious information that should be preserved.
Last but not least: the final user doesn't know how the IV engine works (cache, updates to the server less frequent) and just open the IVs in Telegram to read - so if the website usually updates its content, for the user the article is in its last update (if not specified differently) and probably won't check the website to control that. As said, for me the best is to leave a track in the footer.
- Type of issue
- Rudimentary content not removed
- Reported
- Mar 19, 2019
In my opinion the date of last modification //div[@class="c-article__lastModified"] is a rudimentary content that must be removed.
If you look at the specific case, the news is 19:49 on the same day. I think it is irrelevant for the reader to know that in the following 70 minutes there has been an update, without knowing what kind of change has taken place.