Processed Issues14

This page shows a list of issues for thefootballfaithful.com that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #1 Issue #1
Feb 5, 2019
This article should have an instant view page
T•m
There's a custom widget to display images loaded from an external web Page (i couldn't manage to extract a direct src to the resource) , that's why I marked It as unsupported.
Declined by admin
May be accepted if you demonstrate a template that can fully support the content on this page.
Template #1 Issue #2
Feb 5, 2019
IV is required for this page. My template displays this page well.
T•m
The image you are taking is different from the post, it has a watermark on it. Is that allowed or it should be marked as unsupported as I do? Let's wait for an admin resolution.
Accepted by admin
The watermark is not intrusive enough to warrant unsupporting this page. Seems like a decent tradeoff.
Template #3 Issue #1
Feb 7, 2019
image missing, check current candidate or the original content outside telegram platform.
Accepted by admin
Template #2 Issue #1
Feb 8, 2019
Twitter embeds are missing
Accepted by admin
Template #10 Issue #1
Feb 8, 2019
It needs IV. Something is wrong here.
Ilya Borovik
thanks for the report!
Accepted by admin
Template #14 Issue #1
Feb 8, 2019
Related articles
Accepted by admin
Template #15 Issue #1
Feb 9, 2019
related articles are missing.
Ilya Borovik
thank you for showing a page with the published date issue!
Accepted by admin
Template #17 Issue #1
Feb 9, 2019
related posts are missing.
Ilya Borovik
Yes, I agree that these links are related articles.

The main problem is that these articles are "Partially Related" or, I would say, these are"Recently published Related" articles.
They are dynamically generated for each article based on some, let's say, similar keyword and content stuff, and include ONLY the articles published in the recent days (Feb. 8-9 as for today, Feb. 9).

Let's look at any article published a few months ago. For example, this one from March 2018: https://thefootballfaithful.com/five-best-manchester-united-v-liverpool-games/

If you compare related articles there and for this page, they are almost the same (all related articles are published on Feb. 8-9).

Conclusion: "Related Articles" block is dynamic for this domain and according to Checklist 6.3.2 (https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-3-2-related-articles) is not suitable for static IV format as:
- Dynamic lists of “Latest articles from this category”
Declined by admin
Template #17 Issue #2
Feb 12, 2019
"Subscribe to our YouTube channel" can be identified and deleted.
This phrase is displayed below all the posts that the video is from YouTube.
For example:
https://thefootballfaithful.com/cristiano-ronaldo-best-quotes-manchester-madrid/
https://thefootballfaithful.com/dennis-bergkamp-best-quotes/
https://thefootballfaithful.com/louis-van-gaal-quotes-manchester-united/


Checklist:
Many articles include something like “check out our facebook page” at the end of every text. Such links must be removed if they are consistently placed in an identifiable container.
https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-3-6-social-media-links
Ilya Borovik
Thanks for a last second report!
Let's wait three more days :)
Accepted by admin
Template #26 Issue #1
Feb 12, 2019
Image link is missing here.
Accepted by admin
Template #30 Issue #1
Feb 15, 2019
Missing image captions. My template shows all captions well. Just like the original site. Check out it.
Ilya Borovik
Hi! Here's my opinion.

The only reliable way to extract images from Getty is to use media.gettyimages.com/photos/ url with their ID.

Yes, "West Ham United FC" in caption is lost, but the photographer is presented as a watermark on the image. Copyright is preserved.
Also, the link to the image on Getty is not thrown away so any viewer can always open it and get the full information about the image.

I was referencing the following issue and tried to display photos: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/thefootballfaithful.com/template1/issue2/

To admins: Finally, It should be clarified how should we do:
1) Wrap images into Getty Embed iFrame and leave them as they are
2) Display them the way I do and keeping the link to original image
Declined by admin
It's better to mark getty embeds as unsupported, but since you already extracted images, I don't accept the issue
Template #31 Issue #1
Feb 15, 2019
Author used own self-hosted script (https://seo33.ir/instantview/getty/surprise.php) for processing content. Is it legal? It can be risky.
Deleted Account
The author of the site has used almost all his posts to display images from the third-party website gettyimages.com and you can not ignore it.
This site you mentioned(seo33) is mine and I have provided an accurate script to get rid of the problem of incomplete displaying images from gettyimages.com.

Thus in fact, I have made the best possible output for telegram IV.

If you are supposed to be protesting a third party seo33, you must first appeal to a third party gettyimages!
And if we do not cover these pages because of your issue, in fact all our efforts will be destroyed.
Accepted by admin
Using own scripts for IV definitely isn't acceptable by the platform standards. Pages with getty embeds shouldn't generate IV
Template #30 Issue #2
Feb 15, 2019
Pages with getty embeds shouldn't generate IV

According to this issue:
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/thefootballfaithful.com/template31/issue1/
Ilya Borovik
I am specifying the answer from https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/thefootballfaithful.com/template30/issue1/

Let's compare original embeds and images in IV:
1) The same photo without any losses.
2) Embeds do not offer image zooming and redirect to the image details page on Getty. This behaviour is present in IV: image link points to the same Getty page with details.
3) Credits to photographer are present in embed (below the image) and in IV (on the image). Copyrights are preserved.
4) Difference: there is no way to extract Collection name knowing the photo ID. I find it not critical because the main parts like photo, credits and link are present. Collection is always found on the details page. Not sure if official support for Getty Embeds will be better, but simple like this.

I hope to get a response with argumentation. We already have opposite answers from admins. I use official Getty API to retrieve photos and think there is no bad thing in displaying Getty Images the way I do.
Declined by admin
It's better to mark Getty embeds as unsupported, but since the template already extracted them using Getty API and there was a lot of confusing answers from admins, I don't accept the issue.
Template #30 Issue #3
Feb 18, 2019
"Pages with getty embeds shouldn't generate IV."
admin said this in an other issue
Ilya Borovik
Duplicate issue.

Also, another admin said the opposite here: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/thefootballfaithful.com/template1/issue2/

I am not going to revoke my template and will wait for the final decision from admins.

I have already discussed my opinion on Getty embeds here:
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/thefootballfaithful.com/template30/issue1/
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/thefootballfaithful.com/template30/issue2/

My way to show Getty images preserves all important components including photo, copyright and link to Getty page with details.

P.S. please do not report Getty related issues and do no waste admin's time.
It is better to report other issues if you already found them! :)
Declined by admin
See: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/thefootballfaithful.com/template30/issue2/