Preview
Issue #1
this hr could be rudimentary since there' nothing before.
- Pavel T.
- This block is separated on original page
- Accepted by admin
- There's no need to separate it from the nothing above.
- Pavel T.
- How should we check if there's text before, for example? Xpath has no tools like ./prev-sibling::text() or something else.
Is it REALLY CRITICAL issue, guys? Wait, you've declined my issues about incorrect images in blockquotes, you've declined my issues on templates where asides were presented as a plain text block, but now my template got rejected just because I don't predict that this block can be placed at the beginning of article? Seriously? Does this <hr> make some problem for reader, or look weird, or anything in Checklist says that this way of separating blocks is not acceptable?
- Accepted by admin
- xPath allows to check any previous sibling.
- Type of issue
- Rudimentary content not removed
- Reported
- Apr 7, 2019