Preview
Issue #3
Highlighted items should be removed or moved to <related> (Russian for: "Also read: 10 legal ways to lower your water bill payment")
- igor
- Well, we have a double-edged sword here.
On the one side, this link should be removed (to be consistent with styling in my IV template).
On the other side, it shouldn't: it's the end of the article, the link leads to some page of u-f.ru, so there are no problems. If we check the rules: https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-3-2-related-articles
> We will also not accept issues based on ‘further reading’ links being present.
According to this, your issue is incorrect and can be dropped.
So @admin's intervention is needed here. I will submit a new version, if there is a guarantee I still take the 1st place.
Otherwise, we can start to require related articles support from all players for this site. It'll be honest in relation to me: the issue is incorrect, though I lose the 1st place, and able to climb up back sending the same issue to the other players.
- Declined by admin
- It is obligatory to format “Related articles” links using the new <related> tag, provided they are identifiable in the source. In this case the link doesn't have any classes, so it is not easily identifiable
- Type of issue
- Rudimentary content not removed
- Reported
- Feb 5, 2019