Preview
Issue #2
remove social
- Deleted Account
- it wasnt automatically added link, so i dont think we need to remove author's content
- Accepted by admin
- Social media links should be removed. Template #5 handles the case better.
- Deleted Account
- this is normal paragraph with FB link which written by article's author
> Social media links and buttons removed, including “Share” and “Like” links and buttons
I dont think that it is meant that absolutely all links to social media should be deleted, but rather those that are added automatically and are not in the text of the article, moreover this rule written in the context of share buttons and etc
for example look https://www.vesti.bg/bulgaria/incidenti/pobojnikyt-ot-shejnovo-celial-vechna-mladost-6071260
there is no such link
The author of the article can write, for example, that in the facebook group there is additional material on the topic of the article - this is just an example, but do you really think that such links should be deleted?
- Declined by admin
- This issue has been accepted as a result of a mistake on our part. While it is necessary to remove advertising and social media buttons, this paragraph is different.
It is not possible to reliably identify such links in the body of the article. Template #5 does this by eliminating any paragraph that contains a link to this specific Facebook page – a dangerous solution that could result in corrupted IVs. We apologize for our admin's mistake and the confusion it may have caused.
The template is now restored to the contest.
- Type of issue
- Rudimentary content not removed
- Reported
- Jun 18, 2017