The Instant View Editor uses a three-column layout, so you really want to use it on a desktop screen that's wide enough. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Back to the main page »

Original

Preview

Link Preview

Issue #2

Giovanni M.
I think it's wrong to use <related> blocks this way. The author refers to this precise list of articles in the text above (that is, each element of the list is essential for him). IV may not be available for some pages and as a result the associated page may disappear from these <related> block. Therefore the reader can miss essential contents.
View link in Giovanni's template
Falko
I think the <related> tag was meant to be used this way. These were the specifications from 6.3.2:
Related articles:
- Are thematically related to the current article.
- May also be located on a different website.
- Lists of related articles are (relatively) static (a news item may eventually get an extra link to the newest piece on the topic, but this just adds another item to an otherwise static list).

These tags fulfill all of the conditions.
Type of issue
IV page is missing essential content
Reported
Feb 10, 2019