Contest - Instant View

Processed Issues28

This page shows a list of issues for apparat.cc that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #1 Sasha B	Issue #1 May 19, 2017	Sedric Author's name on IV page must link to the author URL if an author URL is specified in the source. Declined by admin Author links are optional. See https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-clarifications
Template #2 Artem Grechka	Issue #1 May 21, 2017	Артур Лисс Link to the author missing Declined by admin
Template #5 admin	Issue #1 May 30, 2017	🎅 missing admin For reader's convenience an author's info has been moved to the bottom of the page, because it's not the main content of the article. Declined by admin
Template #4 Artem Grechka	Issue #1 Jun 3, 2017	Ragnar Sigurðsson Background pic is missing Declined by admin
Template #1 Sasha B	Issue #2 Jun 4, 2017	Deleted Account IV not generated for target page - EMBED_NOT_SUPPORTED. Sasha B It returns you the correct error. According to the docs, "It is important to identify that a page contains essential unsupported content — no IV page will be generated to ensure that the user never gets incomplete info from an article". This particular page has a map and without it the page would be incomplete Declined by admin Dynamic and interactive pages shouldn't generate IV: https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#2-iv-targets-must-not-generate
Template #3 Артур Лисс	Issue #1 Jun 4, 2017	Deleted Account IV not generated for target page - EMBED_NOT_SUPPORTED. Артур Лисс It's not because it shouldn't be: a page with such an interactive map can't be made into an IV page Declined by admin
Template #4 Artem Grechka	Issue #2 Jun 4, 2017	Deleted Account IV not generated for target page - EMBED_NOT_SUPPORTED. Declined by admin Kindly resubmit with a link to a template that handles this case better.
Template #5 admin	Issue #2 Jun 4, 2017	Deleted Account IV not generated for target page. admin The page has interactive elements as a main content (map by StoryMapJS), which are not supported by IV. As a core of the article they can't be removed, so the page just doesn't generate. Declined by admin
Template #6 🎅	Issue #1 Jun 4, 2017	Deleted Account IV not generated for target page - EMBED_NOT_SUPPORTED. Declined by admin
Template #7 Andrey Mesyats	Issue #1 Jun 4, 2017	Deleted Account IV not generated for target page - EMBED_NOT_SUPPORTED. Andrey Mesyats This is good. Isn't it? Declined by admin
Template #1 Sasha B	Issue #3 Jun 6, 2017	Виктор Кондратьев This paragraph should be relaced with figcaption Accepted by admin
Template #3 Артур Лисс	Issue #2 Jun 6, 2017	Виктор Кондратьев This paragraph should be replaced with figcaption Accepted by admin
Template #4 Artem Grechka	Issue #3 Jun 6, 2017	Виктор Кондратьев This paragraph should be replaced with figcaption Accepted by admin
Template #1 Sasha B	Issue #4 Jun 7, 2017	Evgeny Karpovich header include headear and subtitle Declined by admin Kindly resubmit with a link to a template that handles this case better.
Template #4 Artem Grechka	Issue #4 Jun 7, 2017	Evgeny Karpovich miss picture Accepted by admin If there is now way to display all the essential material properly then IV should not be generated.
Template #5 admin	Issue #3 Jun 7, 2017	Evgeny Karpovich no iv admin The page has heavy interactive elements (graphs by Infogram). They are important for the article and can't be removed. So the page just doesn't generate Declined by admin Kindly resubmit with a link to a template that handles this case better.
Template #6 🎅	Issue #2 Jun 7, 2017	Evgeny Karpovich no iv Declined by admin Kindly resubmit with a link to a template that handles this case better.
Template #7 Andrey Mesyats	Issue #2 Jun 7, 2017	Evgeny Karpovich no iv Andrey Mesyats iframe with src = e.inforgr.am Declined by admin Kindly resubmit with a link to a template that handles this case better.
Template #8 Артур Лисс	Issue #1 Jun 7, 2017	Evgeny Karpovich it's not a paragraph it's picture text Артур Лисс It's not a caption, it's a comment about the video Declined by admin
Template #8 Артур Лисс	Issue #2 Jun 7, 2017	Evgeny Karpovich it's not link Accepted by admin
Template #5 admin	Issue #4 Jun 18, 2017	Артур Лисс This part of the article is semantically a pullquote, not a blockquote. No one is being cited (it's the same interviewee), this is just a highlight. admin It's more a design question, but not an issue. Speaking of semantics: this is not a pullquote, because it's not taken from the main text of the article. See: http://i.imgur.com/9CoTGPA.png Accepted by admin Speaking of semantics Captiaon Raptor is right. But It's displayed centered in the article's text and is looking like a pullquote. That's why it should be shown as such. admin There're several reasons why pull-quote shouldn't be used for such blocks: 1. Text is not centered on the source page. It only has bigger font size in the source preview, but it varies depending on screen-width. 2. This block is used for regular quotes. It becomes hard to read long centered text (while on the source page they're not centered). imgur.com/a/ZP8xY goo.gl/X1nAqA 3. There're other blocks that look much closer to <aside> that handled properly in my template. imgur.com/a/aIRdl goo.gl/U323qa 4. Difference between <aside> and <blockquote> compared to the source is the same: Source: Black border below & above the quote, left-aligned text <blockquote>: Black border on the left, that separates it from other text, left-aligned text <aside>: No borders, centered text. If you still think that my point is wrong, consider checking other templates: they have much more critical issues. Examples: #10: goo.gl/QAiVrk - Missing content imgur.com/a/mE8xA #11: goo.gl/no3sfS - Regular paragraphs used as subtitles. Declined by admin Agree with the appeal.
Template #6 🎅	Issue #3 Jun 18, 2017	Артур Лисс This part of the article is semantically a pullquote, not a blockquote. No one is being cited (it's the same interviewee), this is just a highlight. The blockquotes look differently, look at https://apparat.cc/world/mujica/ for an example. Accepted by admin It's displayed centered in the article's text and is looking like a pullquote. That's why it should be shown as such.
Template #6 🎅	Issue #4 Jun 18, 2017	Артур Лисс The formatting in this IV looks confusing: the headers don't read like sentences, which they should, and don't visually group well. It would be better to get rid of subheaders (combine them with the previous lines) or at least to divide the sections better. Accepted by admin
Template #7 Andrey Mesyats	Issue #3 Jun 18, 2017	Артур Лисс Not sure if using pullquotes is appropriate here. It's certainly not semantic as these sentences are really headers. Declined by admin
Template #6 🎅	Issue #5 Jun 18, 2017	Артур Лисс The author and the text of the quote stuck together. Accepted by admin
Template #7 Andrey Mesyats	Issue #4 Jun 18, 2017	Артур Лисс Somewhat strange formatting of the author info in the first quote and unnecessary blank space in the rest Accepted by admin
Template #6 🎅	Issue #6 Jun 18, 2017	Артур Лисс This seems to fall under 2.2 since it's a contact page for advertisers. It's certainly not an article and the stats on it can change in the future. Also the email (which is kinda the point of the page) is not visible here because of protection, it should at least be marked as unsupported. Declined by admin
Template #6 🎅	Issue #7 Jun 18, 2017	Артур Лисс Two lead paragraphs in the original are made into one subtitle. It's too big of a subtitle if it's several paragraphs in the original. Accepted by admin

Processed Issues28

Log In