Processed Issues28

This page shows a list of issues for apparat.cc that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #1 Issue #1
May 19, 2017
Author's name on IV page must link to the author URL if an author URL is specified in the source.
Declined by admin
Author links are optional. See https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-clarifications
Template #2 Issue #1
May 21, 2017
Link to the author missing
Declined by admin
Template #5 Issue #1
May 30, 2017
missing
admin
For reader's convenience an author's info has been moved to the bottom of the page, because it's not the main content of the article.
Declined by admin
Template #4 Issue #1
Jun 3, 2017
Background pic is missing
Declined by admin
Template #1 Issue #2
Jun 4, 2017
IV not generated for target page - EMBED_NOT_SUPPORTED.
sasha b
It returns you the correct error. According to the docs, "It is important to identify that a page contains essential unsupported content — no IV page will be generated to ensure that the user never gets incomplete info from an article". This particular page has a map and without it the page would be incomplete
Declined by admin
Dynamic and interactive pages shouldn't generate IV: https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#2-iv-targets-must-not-generate
Template #3 Issue #1
Jun 4, 2017
IV not generated for target page - EMBED_NOT_SUPPORTED.
Артур Лисс
It's not because it shouldn't be: a page with such an interactive map can't be made into an IV page
Declined by admin
Template #4 Issue #2
Jun 4, 2017
IV not generated for target page - EMBED_NOT_SUPPORTED.
Declined by admin
Kindly resubmit with a link to a template that handles this case better.
Template #5 Issue #2
Jun 4, 2017
IV not generated for target page.
admin
The page has interactive elements as a main content (map by StoryMapJS), which are not supported by IV. As a core of the article they can't be removed, so the page just doesn't generate.
Declined by admin
Template #6 Issue #1
Jun 4, 2017
IV not generated for target page - EMBED_NOT_SUPPORTED.
Declined by admin
Template #7 Issue #1
Jun 4, 2017
IV not generated for target page - EMBED_NOT_SUPPORTED.
Andrey Mesyats
This is good. Isn't it?
Declined by admin
Template #1 Issue #3
Jun 6, 2017
This paragraph should be relaced with figcaption
Accepted by admin
Template #3 Issue #2
Jun 6, 2017
This paragraph should be replaced with figcaption
Accepted by admin
Template #4 Issue #3
Jun 6, 2017
This paragraph should be replaced with figcaption
Accepted by admin
Template #1 Issue #4
Jun 7, 2017
header include headear and subtitle
Declined by admin
Kindly resubmit with a link to a template that handles this case better.
Template #4 Issue #4
Jun 7, 2017
miss picture
Accepted by admin
If there is now way to display all the essential material properly then IV should not be generated.
Template #5 Issue #3
Jun 7, 2017
no iv
admin
The page has heavy interactive elements (graphs by Infogram). They are important for the article and can't be removed. So the page just doesn't generate
Declined by admin
Kindly resubmit with a link to a template that handles this case better.
Template #6 Issue #2
Jun 7, 2017
no iv
Declined by admin
Kindly resubmit with a link to a template that handles this case better.
Template #7 Issue #2
Jun 7, 2017
no iv
Andrey Mesyats
iframe with src = e.inforgr.am
Declined by admin
Kindly resubmit with a link to a template that handles this case better.
Template #8 Issue #1
Jun 7, 2017
it's not a paragraph it's picture text
Артур Лисс
It's not a caption, it's a comment about the video
Declined by admin
Template #8 Issue #2
Jun 7, 2017
it's not link
Accepted by admin
Template #5 Issue #4
Jun 18, 2017
This part of the article is semantically a pullquote, not a blockquote. No one is being cited (it's the same interviewee), this is just a highlight.
admin
It's more a design question, but not an issue.

Speaking of semantics: this is not a pullquote, because it's not taken from the main text of the article. See: http://i.imgur.com/9CoTGPA.png
Accepted by admin
Speaking of semantics Captiaon Raptor is right. But It's displayed centered in the article's text and is looking like a pullquote. That's why it should be shown as such.
admin
There're several reasons why pull-quote shouldn't be used for such blocks:

1. Text is not centered on the source page. It only has bigger font size in the source preview, but it varies depending on screen-width.
2. This block is used for regular quotes. It becomes hard to read long centered text (while on the source page they're not centered). imgur.com/a/ZP8xY goo.gl/X1nAqA
3. There're other blocks that look much closer to <aside> that handled properly in my template. imgur.com/a/aIRdl goo.gl/U323qa
4. Difference between <aside> and <blockquote> compared to the source is the same:
Source: Black border below & above the quote, left-aligned text
<blockquote>: Black border on the left, that separates it from other text, left-aligned text
<aside>: No borders, centered text.

If you still think that my point is wrong, consider checking other templates: they have much more critical issues. Examples:
#10: goo.gl/QAiVrk - Missing content imgur.com/a/mE8xA
#11: goo.gl/no3sfS - Regular paragraphs used as subtitles.
Declined by admin
Agree with the appeal.
Template #6 Issue #3
Jun 18, 2017
This part of the article is semantically a pullquote, not a blockquote. No one is being cited (it's the same interviewee), this is just a highlight. The blockquotes look differently, look at https://apparat.cc/world/mujica/ for an example.
Accepted by admin
It's displayed centered in the article's text and is looking like a pullquote. That's why it should be shown as such.
Template #6 Issue #4
Jun 18, 2017
The formatting in this IV looks confusing: the headers don't read like sentences, which they should, and don't visually group well. It would be better to get rid of subheaders (combine them with the previous lines) or at least to divide the sections better.
Accepted by admin
Template #7 Issue #3
Jun 18, 2017
Not sure if using pullquotes is appropriate here. It's certainly not semantic as these sentences are really headers.
Declined by admin
Template #6 Issue #5
Jun 18, 2017
The author and the text of the quote stuck together.
Accepted by admin
Template #7 Issue #4
Jun 18, 2017
Somewhat strange formatting of the author info in the first quote and unnecessary blank space in the rest
Accepted by admin
Template #6 Issue #6
Jun 18, 2017
This seems to fall under 2.2 since it's a contact page for advertisers. It's certainly not an article and the stats on it can change in the future. Also the email (which is kinda the point of the page) is not visible here because of protection, it should at least be marked as unsupported.
Declined by admin
Template #6 Issue #7
Jun 18, 2017
Two lead paragraphs in the original are made into one subtitle. It's too big of a subtitle if it's several paragraphs in the original.
Accepted by admin