The Instant View Editor uses a three-column layout, so you really want to use it on a desktop screen that's wide enough. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Back to the main page »

Original

Preview

Link Preview

Issue #1

It's possible to obtain better image resolution.
When several image resolutions are available, the IV page should use better quality images.

Ex.:
Image in your template:
https://www.brasil247.com/images/cache/490x280/crop/images%7Ccms-image-000620271.jpg

Image in my template:
https://www.brasil247.com/images/cms-image-000620271.jpg


Just like this issue:
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/dniprograd.org/template30/issue5/
Maxi
In case of text limit: https://telegra.ph/youre-confused-brasil247com-t-110-i-1-03-03-2

Hm... Ok, let's look at the "similar" issue.
You've had the following schema:
<a data-lightbox="gallery" href="url/VERY_LARGE/{id}.jpg>
<img src="url/LARGE_POST/{id}.jpg">
</a>
So, "src" option manipulation is changing LARGE_POST to VERY_LARGE.

The current html schema is:
<a href="ARTICLE_URL">
<img src="/images/cache/490x280/crop/images%7Ccms-image-000620271.jpg">
</a>
Do you see the difference? I think the difference is obvious.

So I think you suggest me to use one of 2 options:
1 - to use the meta OG image as a cover (which is a bad practice and npt reliably). For example only on this page you can see 3(!!) images in the meta:
OG:IMAGE : cms-image-000617586.jpg
OG:IMAGE : cms-image-000620271.jpg
OG:IMAGE : cms-image-000620272.jpg
So, a little bit weird way.
2 - to use unknown src manipulation. Why is it unknown? Because, at least there is no any <a> tags with over the <img> tag, like in your case (dniprograd.org
Declined by admin
Type of issue
IV page is missing essential content
Reported
Mar 3, 2019