There is no photo in original page.This image is located in ad class.I think it is rudimentary and should be removed.This ad class may be changed by website developers and may contains ad content in the future.
- subscribe to pewdiepie
- >This image is located in ad class.
Wow, you lied here. It's <ad>-tag block (check html), <ad> and <img> in it have no class.
>There is no photo in original page.
There is a photo on the original page, again, open this article and check its html. And this white gap is also present there, see https://ibb.co/TW1qy5q.
>I think it is rudimentary and should be removed.This ad class may be changed by website developers and may contains ad content in the future.
Again, it is not "ad class", it has no class / id / etc. We can't not know what this element was meant to contain, so why do you believe it's an advertisement? If you check html-code of <ad>, you will see that its content is essential as it contains the last paragraph of the article.
Also this article is from 2016, modern articles don't have such problems and even for old articles it seems like a one-off case. Thus I think this issue is not critical.
- Declined by admin
- Weird markup. Either it's broken or outdated.
Since there's no such issue in the most recent articles, it's not critical
- Type of issue
- Rudimentary content not removed
- Apr 30 at 8:52 AM