The Instant View Editor uses a three-column layout, so you really want to use it on a desktop screen that's wide enough. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Back to the main page »

Original

Preview

Link Preview

Issue #2

can be obtained higher image quality, see my template(If you say, that my method is not safe then there are anyway another method of getting it from srcset. And higher quality is available even in the srcset.)
Rochelle
The image is 768x1024, which I thought was high enough quality for IV. If we remove the resolution from the URL, it looks like the image is 800x1067, which is slightly higher but not a big difference.

I don't see a higher one listed in the srcset. The largest one listed is the version in the regular src:
<img data-src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/factmag-images/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/earl-model-1-768x1024.jpg" data-thumb="https://s3.amazonaws.com/factmag-images/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/earl-model-1-150x110.jpg" data-gallery="https://s3.amazonaws.com/factmag-images/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/earl-model-1-739x985.jpg" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/factmag-images/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/earl-model-1-768x1024.jpg">
Declined by admin
I'm more concerned why all images in the slideshow are duplicated.

It seems it's original article issue. It has been updated, and this is a cached version.
Accepted by admin
We are deeply sorry, but we declined this issue by mistake. The actual issue was related to the cover image, not the slideshow.

The checklist says:
"When several image resolutions are available, the IV page should use better quality images (within reason). The optimal resolution range is 1280px-2560px"

https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-2-1-image-quality

Since this image is available in 1122x800 and the current template uses a pic of 616x440, it's fair to say that it should be used in a higher quality. Sorry for the inconveniences.
Type of issue
IV page is missing essential content
Reported
Mar 5, 2019