Preview
Link Preview
JUG.ru
Дайджест: восторги и проклятия в адрес Hibernate
Два разных сайта опубликовали противоположные по духу материалы о фреймворке Hibernate: один о том, как всё хорошо, другой о том, как всё плохо. На SitePoint вслед за недавними «5 причинами использовать JPA / Hibernate» опубликовали «Введение в Hibernate: хранимые объекты по-лёгкому». Оба материала
Два разных сайта опубликовали противоположные по духу материалы о фреймворке Hibernate: один о том, как всё хорошо, другой о том, как всё плохо. На SitePoint вслед за недавними «5 причинами использовать JPA / Hibernate» опубликовали «Введение в Hibernate: хранимые объекты по-лёгкому». Оба материала

Issue #4
- Saturn
- I think the point of IV is about article itself, and we just wasted so much time debating wether to add those related/or not links.
- Type of issue
- Rudimentary content not removed
- Reported
- Feb 9, 2019
And how in checklist can live together two statements:
1) main statement that other types of “More” links that are not suitable ("not suitable" highlighted) for the “Related articles” block should be removed ("removed" highlighted)
and 2) notice that other “More" links are identifiable and not either removed or formatted as “Related articles”
How they can be either removed or formatted as "Related articles" if just before that was said that they "should be removed"
I am sure that it is goes against spirit of Instant View to show in IV-template FIXED list of "related articles" when it really CHANGES EVERY TIME you load the original page.
Have you any arbitrator? Or who wrote checklist? I want him to see this case.
And even if you decline all these issues (sorry that there are so much of them, but we have no chat with you to clarify any situations), I want him at least to see rules ones more for all this