subtitle is missing

Usual static article

Usual static article

Slideshows are REQUIRED only if the source article shows several photos or other media as a slideshow or gallery. (c) Checklist

This is the case, slideshow must be present.

2Adm: this issue is a part of dialog started in Issue #1.

This article not used images as the main medium and we can't verify that.

Because this is usual news and if another article with a slider will contain more text, then your argument will not be valid.

For example, this is real case where slider is main content and we can detect that in url: http://iz.ru/605348/gallery/prazdnovanie-dnia-rossii-v-moskve

But in the case on kickoff.com this is the usual news where can be a lot of text.

that text is presented as a caption on the original page

that text is presented as a caption on the original page

Adv link

this is a slideshow on the original page

Missing date

Uncorrect title

this is not bold in the original page

I don't think it's wise to get the publication date from the title - anything could be written there. Also if that's the date then it should be removed from the title

We can use date on this page

I don't think it's wise to get the publication date from the title - anything could be written there. Also if that's the date then it should be removed from the title

Missing actual description in Link Preview.

My template make it more better.

3.2. Link preview
If a short description exists in the source, it must be used for the link preview (OpenGraph descriptions, lead sections, etc.).

2Adm: this issue is a part of dialog started in Issue #3.

All sites insert description by default, but in this case it does not tell us anything.

You insert a title, and then a default description, but that does not match the title. It's not right and looks awful.

Please read the rules that say we should use suitable content for description and in this case it should be video description.

3.2. Link preview
If a short description exists in the source, it must be used for the link preview (OpenGraph descriptions, lead sections, etc.).

2Adm: this issue is a part of dialog started in Issue #3.

From your description in Link Preview, the user will not be able to understand what is on the page.

We must use the relevant description when there is a possibility.

Full article in the short description of link preview.

2Issue#2

"Read the rules, they say that we must use lead sections if it's required."

Where is the lead section in your article? I just see figcaption.

I do not understand why you are arguing. You both have the element <figcaption>, one has it selected as <b>, the other does not. This is optional for both cases. This is not a critical error.

Anything that is not essential to the article should be removed

Wrong author

Why did you delete the relevant links "Read also", but did not delete the pure ads to external website

"Sign up for SMS ..."