Preview
Issue #1
- !! !!
- Not in our case. I think it's not critical to reject, because we have conflicting dates inside the source pages.
article:published_time: 2016-04-22T15:30:19
WHAT USER SEE: 22 abril - 15:19
CHECKLIST:
> If conflicting dates are stored in multiple places on the source page, preference should be given to the time that is visible to the ordinary user who views the page in a browser.
This site contains meta info which conflicting with date, visible to the ordinary user. Based on this, I decided not to trust this meta compeletely and follow the checklist.
- Type of issue
- IV page is missing essential content
- Reported
- Apr 20, 2019
<meta property="article:published_time" content="2016-04-22T15:30:19-03:00">