The Instant View Editor uses a three-column layout, so you really want to use it on a desktop screen that's wide enough. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Back to the main page »

Original

Preview

Link Preview

Issue #3

NON- ISSUE. IT'S A REPLY ON ISSUE #2

My apologize for issue #2 I didn't see the link on the photo.
Anyway issue #1 is still valid in my opinion.

Marco, please don't offend and try to play fair. We are all people. Of course I was wrong but issue#2 wasn't a duplicate.
Marco Zordan
You issue a link, as in the original site there is the link on the lens, but do you also have the same link on the photo? Does the tool you use have any bugs?

Issue 1 is absolutely not valid. You're just looking for a difference from the other templates. The quality is in many identical photos and the resolution changes by a few px.
Are you trying to make fun of the admin?

Dozens of cases where you lose the sense of the picture, make the picture worse, or create duplicates. 3 examples:
1) loses context: https://www.milannews.it/l-editoriale/le-10-giornate-di-gattuso-con-una-tabella-da-21-punti-per-tornare-in-champions-ed -delete-i-its-protesters-328104
2) worst picture: https://www.milannews.it/primo-piano/maldini-alza-la-voce-o-si-trova-un-punto-d-incontro-con-la-uefa-o-elliott -and-ready-to-fight-legal-329879
3) duplicate: https://www.milannews.it/casa-milan/foto-mn-casa-milan-striscione-curva-sud-non-si-accettano-ricatti-avanti-cosi-milan-256692

I trust in the admin declining all your issues..and your t
Type of issue
Rudimentary content not removed
Reported
Apr 11, 2019