The Instant View Editor uses a three-column layout, so you really want to use it on a desktop screen that's wide enough. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Back to the main page »



Link Preview

Issue #3

A bit of explanation for Artem Morziev's issue #2, because I think he's exactly right on this one. I initially overlooked this issue, but when he reported it for my template I had to agree.

It's true that the Checklist says that issues regarding "related articles" bit being static or thematically related *enough*. But doesn't mean that any block of links will do as a <related> material. Links still must be identifiable as "related" to be suitable.

The Checklist lists which kinds of links are not suitable. Specifically:
- (Consistently) random unrelated articles.
- Dynamic lists of “Latest articles from this category”.

These in-cut blocks always contain random articles from a category, which actually matches the two claused above.
duplicated issue
Declined by admin
Being too dynamic would just be a case that handling as <related> would not be obligatory.

For acceptable issues:
"Other “More" links are identifiable and not either removed or formatted as “Related articles”."

In this case, they are handled as <related> though, which is still okay.

So removal or handling as <related> should be okay in this case.
Type of issue
Rudimentary content not removed
Feb 18, 2019