Processed Issues30

This page shows a list of issues for rts.rs that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #1 Issue #1
Jun 11, 2017
No time of article.
I process it in my template.
Accepted by admin
Template #2 Issue #1
Jun 11, 2017
No image from article
Accepted by admin
Template #6 Issue #1
Jun 17, 2017
No caption of cover image
Accepted by admin
Template #4 Issue #1
Jun 17, 2017
It is not subtitle - it is lead.
Declined by admin
The subtitle is optional in this case.
Template #6 Issue #4
Jun 17, 2017
No date&time of article
Accepted by admin
Template #4 Issue #2
Jun 17, 2017
There is image between these paragraphs in source - check it, please.
You can load it using @inline or mark as unsupported.

My template process it and show this image.
Accepted by admin
Template #6 Issue #5
Jun 17, 2017
There is image between these paragraphs in source - check it, please.
You can load it using @inline or mark as unsupported.

My template process it and show this image.
Accepted by admin
Template #5 Issue #3
Jun 19, 2017
This article exist video
Accepted by admin
Template #6 Issue #6
Jun 19, 2017
This article exist video
Accepted by admin
Template #3 Issue #1
Jun 19, 2017
This is catalog
Accepted by admin
This page must not generate an IV in accordance to 2.1 of Perfect Template Checklist:
https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#2-iv-targets-must-not-generate
Template #3 Issue #2
Jun 19, 2017
This is cover
Declined by admin
The cover is optional in this case.
Template #6 Issue #7
Jun 19, 2017
Author wrong
Accepted by admin
Template #6 Issue #8
Jun 19, 2017
Images missing
Accepted by admin
Template #7 Issue #1
Feb 5, 2019
That's a valid article, but no view provided
Accepted by admin
The page should generate an IV.
Template #7 Issue #2
Feb 5, 2019
Images from the original article are missing
Accepted by admin
The images are missing.
Template #8 Issue #1
Feb 7, 2019
Missing image. You can see the image if you open the page in the browser. My template handles it.
Dzmitry Radkevich
There is no image in mobile version
Accepted by admin
Template #10 Issue #1
Feb 9, 2019
Missing image
Anvar Utepov
witch image I miss
Accepted by admin
Template #10 Issue #2
Feb 9, 2019
Wrong author. It's the source.
Accepted by admin
Template #10 Issue #3
Feb 9, 2019
The date is missing. It **must** be added.
Accepted by admin
Template #10 Issue #4
Feb 9, 2019
Between these two highlighted paragraphs there is an image in the original website (see screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/PbK9pjD.png).

It's an essential content & it's missing :(
Declined by admin
Duplicate
Template #11 Issue #1
Feb 12, 2019
Well, that's an interesting way to perform this block, but there is a tiny problem. Pullquotes are actually used for other type of content, like poetry or key phrazes that have been _pulled_ from an article, serving to entice readers into the article or to highlight a key topic.

This block is displayed as a side block in the original site, so it's hard to call him a "key phraze" or smth like that.

I experimented with <details> and some other custom tags, seems that the table is the best way to display it. Check out my template. The reader can easily understand what the block is about, due to the gray background (same as in the original website). The font in the table is a litter smaller, than the usual article, and the borders (as in the original website) allows to skip the block in a short time.

It's actually a common solution in responsive websites: two columns become a unit.
Deleted Account
"tables vs aside" again

When something is taken out of the main content flow, I think aside/pullquote suits the purpose better.
Accepted by admin
In this case a table is best option for readability
Deleted Account
Can you please explain this a bit more?

Here is a <table>: https://i.imgur.com/6IHzrWK.jpg
And this is an <aside>: https://i.imgur.com/tanArYR.jpg

By which criteria is the former better than latter and how can I gauge that in the future?

Because for me the latter looks more readable.

Igor argues that a table is more compact and gives a better separation of content. But as you can see on screenshots, things do not seem to be that way for the official Telegram client.
Specifically: the variant with <aside> takes less space and separates from surrounding text more distinctly by having a different font style and more noticeable spacing, especially at the bottom of the block.

Another question: what does make this issue critical either way? There is no any content lost, added or presented in a way rendering it inaccessible.
Accepted by admin
It's more readable because the text is aligned and the block has borders like in the original article.
Template #11 Issue #2
Feb 12, 2019
The author is missing. It can be handled in a reliable way using some heuristics. My template handles this case.
Deleted Account
<p><em>Приредила: Блаженка Бијелић</em></p>

Such heuristics are very fragile. We can't trust hand-crafted formatting to be always the same.
Declined by admin
Template #12 Issue #1
Feb 12, 2019
IV shoulkd be generated
igo
scroll down
Accepted by admin
Error notifications aren't the best thing to show first, I think. The reporter's template handles this case better.
igo
His template is missing the cover image. Open the website in browser please.
Declined by admin
Igor is right. The cover image is necessary. IV won't be generated if the image cannot be downloaded.
Template #12 Issue #2
Feb 12, 2019
IV should be generated
igo
scroll down
Accepted by admin
igo
Open the page in the browser: it's a cover message, that can't be loaded.

The google chrome just downloads it. But the telegram IV server can't do it by a reason that I don't understand.

The Aleksij's template misses this image.
Declined by admin
Template #13 Issue #2
Feb 12, 2019
missed paragraph
Accepted by admin
Template #16 Issue #1
Feb 13, 2019
Hi, @admin! That is a post-complaining.
One of your admins failed and made me sad :(

1. He/She accepted two same issues with identical links:
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/rts.rs/template12/issue1/
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/rts.rs/template12/issue2/

2. This issue ^ is incorrect. IV is generated, though, telegram can't download the first image (at the top, cover). Copy-paste the image's link into a browser:
http://www.rts.rs/upload/thumbnail/2017/06/11/4858302_stoun-i-putin-f2jpg
the image won't be shown, but downloaded. But in the source page, the URL is the same. I want to say, there is a problem in IV engine.

3. Admin said, “The reporter's template handles this case better.”
But that's not truth. The reporter's template is absolutly missing this image. And if the template is missing the image ⇒ there is no errors. That's why the admin decided to reject my template. But... where is the logic? Image is missing, hehey! It's an essential content, what the heck?

4. That guy also c
Declined by admin
You're right. Incorrect issues were declined and your issue for Template #15 has been accepted. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Template #15 Issue #1
Feb 14, 2019
Missing the cover image.

If you confirm the issue, please, @admin, check out my issue-complaining on one of your admins — he rejected my "winner" template because of this (I had the cover image, but telegram IV enigine could not load it).
Accepted by admin
Igor is right. Would be better not to generate IV if an image can't be downloaded than generate all articles without images. (For example http://www.rts.rs/page/magazine/ci/story/401/film-i-tv/3416762/tom-henks-u-ekranizaciji-romana-vesti-iz-sveta.html)
Oleksii Kozub
Ok, but igor's template generate the IV form this image with errors, is it normal to not generate IV if there is some probl;emes with representing cover img?
As you said , that I should generate IV, if went I can't process the cover image?
Accepted by admin
Yes, since it is really an error, so IV is not generated. In this case it is good, because if one day that error is fixed, the page can have IV.
Template #24 Issue #1
Feb 19, 2019
Missing photos, check original page.
Accepted by admin
Template #25 Issue #1
Feb 19, 2019
don`t have content
Declined by admin
Template #25 Issue #4
Feb 22, 2019
Missing published date and time.
Accepted by admin