Processed Issues10

This page shows a list of issues for snopes.com that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #1 Issue #1
May 21, 2017
No cover image
Accepted by admin
Template #2 Issue #1
May 24, 2017
This is a static page and should have an IV available
Declined by admin
Service pages are optional since they don't have interactive elements.
Template #4 Issue #1
Jun 7, 2017
wrong author
Accepted by admin
Template #5 Issue #1
Jun 8, 2017
Missing image caption. Even if it's not aligned directly under the photo in the original article, the image info is still clearly present in the meta section near the author name
Odwalla
I think this issue is irrelevant because the text you are referring to is the alt text, and from rules
6.5 " If the image has no caption, but has meaningful text in the alt attribute, you may use that text as the caption. This is optional, we will not accept issues about alt-text missing from captions."
and clearly from html: <img [...] alt="lazyllama / Shutterstock.com" [..] >
Declined by admin
The caption is optional in this case:
https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-5-captions
Template #5 Issue #2
Jun 18, 2017
Standard article page, should generate IV
Accepted by admin
This page should generate IV. Other templates (#8 and #9) support it.
Template #9 Issue #1
Jun 18, 2017
Missing date
Declined by admin
The date is presented.
Template #9 Issue #2
Jun 19, 2017
My mistake on the previous issue, it's missing author, not date
Declined by admin
The author name is optional in this case.
Template #8 Issue #1
Jun 19, 2017
in one line
Declined by admin
This is for sure no critical issue which would lead to the template being declined. Also the other competitor's template doesn't generate any IV for this site, so this is the better template regarding this issue.
Template #8 Issue #2
Oct 24, 2017
Declined by admin
Template #8 Issue #3
Oct 24, 2017
The “rating” is included in the “claim” quote indentation. It should be separate.
Denis Kondarattsev
It was originally formatted to be like this, since rating has direct relation to claim. Also, it was not possible to present the page in its original way and the current layout is pretty informative, in my opinion
Declined by admin