Duplicated date wasn't removed

Social media links and buttons should be removed

It is advisable to move ‘further reading’ links to the end of the page or remove it from a page

It is advisable to move ‘further reading’ links to the end of the page or remove it from a page

All captions must be preserved

There is external social media link which should be removed from an article. But author decided turn it into embed and insert it into the article. So if original article doesn't have embed then you shouldn't create it. Also it is confusing when you see a word "link" at the bottom but instead of link you see embed which is unavailable.

Author decided remove duplicate date (see other pages in this template), what might be a good idea. But actually it could be hard to support all possible formatting issues which could arise in a future. Here is the one of possible cases which isn't supported. I think better to leave it as it is in original source.

Author taking an author's name from alt attribute of nonexisting image. It isn't good practice what cause of displaying author's name in uppercase in current case (but also could be more seriouse issue when you lose author's name when alt attribute isn't set). Also as said in clarifications - what the user sees when viewing the original article in an ordinary browser has priority over invisible meta-information.

Here you are. Template missing article's author.