Regardless of decision for this domain, I have a comment on the site_name issue in general.
I'm sorry to say that, but if it was an attempt to make things clearer, it clearly failed. With this interpretation of the checklist update, site_name has the only use: submit issues against templates of those, who try to deliver good UX to users.
This "just write what you see on the logo" strategy is complete nonsense. Yes, sometimes it happens to work. Specifically, when the logo is simple text. Just like in the two examples in the checklist. But guess what? It's not always like this. Logos are logos. Not text. Not titles. Not names.
In case of this site, for example, the logo is not necessary even reads as "VI" at first sight for everyone.
Log in here to create Instant View templates. Please enter your phone number in the international format and we will send a confirmation message to your account via Telegram.
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/vi.nl/template73/issue1/
Regardless of decision for this domain, I have a comment on the site_name issue in general.
I'm sorry to say that, but if it was an attempt to make things clearer, it clearly failed. With this interpretation of the checklist update, site_name has the only use: submit issues against templates of those, who try to deliver good UX to users.
This "just write what you see on the logo" strategy is complete nonsense. Yes, sometimes it happens to work. Specifically, when the logo is simple text. Just like in the two examples in the checklist. But guess what? It's not always like this. Logos are logos. Not text. Not titles. Not names.
In case of this site, for example, the logo is not necessary even reads as "VI" at first sight for everyone.
There was another example of this madness recently. I wrote about it here:
https://telegra.ph/kat-site-name-03-27