Processed Issues10

This page shows a list of issues for b9.com.br that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #1 Issue #1
May 20, 2017
missing video
Accepted by admin
Template #2 Issue #1
May 28, 2017
Cover image appers nowhere in the page, so shouldn't be cover instead it shuold be the video that is directly above the title
𝕄аксим
Duplicate of #3
Declined by admin
The site provides a image cover as a fallback to the video cover, therefore it is considered optional to use either.
Template #2 Issue #2
May 28, 2017
Cover image appers nowhere in the page, so shouldn't be cover instead it shuold be the video that is directly above the title
𝕄аксим
Duplicate of #3
Declined by admin
The site provides a image cover as a fallback to the video cover, therefore it is considered optional to use either.
Template #2 Issue #3
May 28, 2017
Cover image appers nowhere in the page, so shouldn't be cover instead it shuold be the video that is directly above the title
𝕄аксим
Cover appears in page source, so can be presented in IV
Declined by admin
The site provides a image cover as a fallback to the video cover, therefore it is considered optional to use either.
Template #2 Issue #4
Jun 14, 2017
missing caption
Accepted by admin
Template #5 Issue #1
Jun 17, 2017
image preview is used for cover instead of full version. Check my template
Odwalla
Not critical issue
Declined by admin
Template #5 Issue #2
Jun 18, 2017
"share" isn't a quote author and should be removed
Accepted by admin
Template #7 Issue #1
Jun 18, 2017
no captions
Declined by admin
Duplicated issue https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/b9.com.br/template2/issue4
Template #8 Issue #1
Jun 18, 2017
need to either remove rudimentary critic rating title, or implement rating in IV
Odwalla
Not critic issue
Accepted by admin
Template #9 handles this case better.
Odwalla
IHMO this issue is not consistent, because based on and optional block. If "nota do crítico" wasn't optional than methyrr's template (https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/b9.com.br/template9/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.b9.com.br%2F74405%2Fcultura%2Fcorra-o-terror-de-uma-sociedade-racista%2F) is wrong because he removed it. I belive that keeping it doesn't represent a critical issue.

Please tell me if I'm mistaken and where I'm wrong
Accepted by admin
This block isn't essential, but if it is preserved, it shouldn't be corrupted. Unfortunately your template neither reworks it nor removes, instead it shows an unformatted text block without the rating, so this is a valid issue.
Template #8 Issue #2
Jun 18, 2017
unsupported element can be converted into supported iframe, check my template
Odwalla
It's an ancient print edition of some article
2010? Seriously?
Declined by admin
It's optional to generate IV for this obscure page.