Contest - Instant View

Processed Issues15

This page shows a list of issues for rockpapershotgun.com that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #2 Sergio	Issue #1 May 20, 2017	!! !! CHECKLIST: 3.1 General properties → Date of publication must be shown on IV page if the date of publication is mentioned anywhere in the source. Accepted by admin
Template #3 !! !!	Issue #1 May 23, 2017	SR Better merge in one Media object and place description as MediaCaption. Accepted by admin
Template #4 !! !!	Issue #1 May 27, 2017	Анон Михалыч Static text page. Should generate IV. !! !! 1) Pay attention to the sample templates. 2) From rules: >>> You must make sure that your template only generates IV pages for articles and !!!does not affect service areas of the website!!!, as well as any other sections unsuitable for IV. 3) I haven't seen confirmed issues like this. Proofs? It seems that this is not an issue Declined by admin As for now, we have a simpler rule: if there are interactive elements ('contact us' form) => no IV. Otherwise, service pages are optional.
Template #4 !! !!	Issue #2 May 27, 2017	Анон Михалыч Original page if opened in desktop browser contains several video fragments that are loaded dynamically and can't be translated into IV. Thus IV should not be generated. !! !! Noted Accepted by admin
Template #8 Sergio	Issue #1 Jun 10, 2017	Анон Михалыч date missing Accepted by admin The date of publication must be shown on IV page if the date of publication is mentioned anywhere in the source (including meta tags).
Template #6 !! !!	Issue #1 Jun 10, 2017	Анон Михалыч This is meta-article. It contains links to other articles in form of clickable areas over the image. This can't be translated to the IV. Accepted by admin
Template #9 Анон Михалыч	Issue #1 Jun 10, 2017	!! !! Original page contains one element Анон Михалыч These are two different quotes. I don't think this should be an issue. Declined by admin While it is not critical, it could be nice to address it in a future revision of the template.
Template #13 !! !!	Issue #1 Jun 17, 2017	Sergio missing IV for static page !! !! It's optional to add IV for pages like this. Declined by admin As for now, we have a simpler rule: if there are interactive elements ('contact us' form) => no IV. Otherwise, service pages are optional.
Template #13 !! !!	Issue #2 Jun 18, 2017	Анон Михалыч image is missing Accepted by admin
Template #19 !! !!	Issue #1 Jun 18, 2017	Sergio I know I already submitted it, sorry. This is a static page in my opinion Declined by admin It can be considered a service page.
Template #19 !! !!	Issue #2 Jun 18, 2017	Sergio this should be an IV in my opinion. no essential content is missed and I rendered it as a link !! !! And if the video does not work, we will publish a link to it, right? I believe, this is an unsupported. Declined by admin Not sure what you guys are talking about, but unsupported videos should lead to not generating IV. In this case there is some other unsupported widged where no IV should generate either.
Template #19 !! !!	Issue #3 Jun 18, 2017	Анон Михалыч The youtube embed can be converted to iframe and the IV will be successfully generated !! !! It doesn't work on site. We will now correct all errors of the site developers? Declined by admin The article is from 2010, it appears that the website doesn't use this formatting now, and the primary scope of the contest is to cover future and currently relevant articles from the web.
Template #19 !! !!	Issue #4 Jun 18, 2017	Sergio video is missing Declined by admin The article is from 2011, it appears that the website doesn't use this formatting now, and the primary scope of the contest is to cover future and currently relevant articles from the web.
Template #28 Анон Михалыч	Issue #1 Jun 19, 2017	!! !! Bad formatting for list in blockquote Анон Михалыч I want to look into eyes of the man that is using <li> elements outside of the list =). That's some exceptionally bad formatting. Accepted by admin Анон Михалыч First of all - this page contains <li> elements outside of list. Using <li> elements without enclosing <ul> or <ol> element is not a valid html markup. The fact that this page looks normal in browser is only a matter of luck - browsers do their best to fix invalid markup on sites. While this can be fixed (and it is fixed in the reporter's template) this is an isolated case of editor's mistake. It is not likely that there is more than one page with this kind of markup. Usually the site uses proper list markup (even within blockquote) which is processed properly, i.e.: https://rockpapershotgun.com/2017/06/08/playerunknowns-battlegrounds-week-11-patch-released There are an infinite number of ways one can mess up an article's markup and it's not template's duty to fix these errors (it's impossible in general for obvious reasons). Template should process valid markup properly. Therefore i think that this issue should not have been accepted. Declined by admin We agree. This is a one-off case of invalid markup in the source and no template can possibly account for all the various ways one could mess up HTML code. The template is now restored.
Template #27 Sergio	Issue #2 Jun 19, 2017	!! !! Bad formatting for list in blockquote Accepted by admin