Contest - Instant View

Processed Issues15

This page shows a list of issues for womenshealthmag.com that were approved or declined by our admins.

Template #1 Andrei Shaidurov	Issue #1 May 20, 2017	Alan Huang There's an exact date/time in the article, which the IV page does not reflect. (16:06:53-04:00 =/= 01:23) Declined by admin The IV editor‘s ’Preview‘ section will always show the date/time in UTC format, while the ’Original' section may use a different time zone. It is possible for a perfect template to display a date/time that is different from the original. (https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-9-date-and-time)
Template #1 Andrei Shaidurov	Issue #2 May 20, 2017	Silas Rosenkranz Author's name on IV page must link to the author URL if an author URL is specified in the source. Declined by admin Author links are optional: https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-2-author-link
Template #1 Andrei Shaidurov	Issue #3 May 20, 2017	Silas Rosenkranz Author of the Image Accepted by admin
Template #3 Alexander	Issue #1 May 27, 2017	Sharon Missing figure captions as captions Accepted by admin
Template #4 Saturn	Issue #1 May 28, 2017	Pavel T. Video is missed. Check here, how it works: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/womenshealthmag.com/template5/ Accepted by admin
Template #4 Saturn	Issue #2 May 28, 2017	Pavel T. author link is missed Declined by admin Author links are optional: https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-2-author-link
Template #5 Pavel T.	Issue #1 May 29, 2017	Saturn this is not suitable for cover, it's not right before or below the title. https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-3-cover-images Accepted by admin
Template #7 Pavel T.	Issue #1 May 29, 2017	Saturn it's related, not pull quote. https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-6-read-also-read-more-more-on-this-topic-links Pavel T. Yes, on original page these blocks formatted like headings. But if we leave them as is, it will complicate reading and allow to confuse "related"s with real headings. It's just a visual trick to make reading of article more comfortable - like one flow, where extraneous elements are separated. Declined by admin This version looks nicer.
Template #7 Pavel T.	Issue #2 Jun 2, 2017	Saturn IV needed. Accepted by admin
Template #10 Saturn	Issue #1 Jun 2, 2017	Pavel T. button without any functions (on original page it's JS button which move to concrete slide) Saturn But it's an indicate. Accepted by admin That button is not needed for IV. In general, buttons should be removed for IV.
Template #11 Pavel T.	Issue #1 Jun 2, 2017	Saturn inline image is missing. Pavel T. It's a JS button on original page. We can't use JS functional on IV pages, so i suppose it's right decision to remove it Declined by admin In general, buttons should be removed for IVs.
Template #11 Pavel T.	Issue #2 Jun 7, 2017	S G "If it is not possible to represent the widget as an iFrame, but it is possible to get a direct link to the video, use this link to generate a <video> with the correct src attribute. Otherwise, mark the object with the @unsupported function." The direct link for this video doesn't exist in the sources. If you hacked the website and picked the similar character sequence to get link to video then it doesn't mean that this link is correct. Pavel T. Take a look again, bro ;) Link exists in the source and it's easy to parse it by IV functions. Declined by admin
Template #11 Pavel T.	Issue #3 Jun 9, 2017	Saturn IV page needed. Accepted by admin
Template #14 Pavel T.	Issue #1 Jun 9, 2017	Saturn twitter link not removed. Pavel T. It's not share button, it's just a part of article with author info without specific tags. Even if i want to remove it, i need to remove all <strong>'s with twitter-links. Declined by admin
Template #14 Pavel T.	Issue #2 Jun 17, 2017	Ivan Nikitin Should have the IV Pavel T. Its landing-like page with very specific content-formats like & ITS OWN .css-file which generates a lot of troubles. Your template doesnt handle it too - you lost at least 2 images which uses parallax-effect & leave small rounded author image in little block as BIG PHOTO & more & more. If you do it similar to source page & prove me that it's possible to support this page correctly - i will try too. Declined by admin There's no template that hadles the case better.