Processed Issues37
This page shows a list of issues for foma.ru that were approved or declined by our admins.
Template #2 |
Issue #1
May 26, 2017
|
interactive page, not supposed for IV
|
Template #2 |
Issue #2
May 26, 2017
|
static page, may need an IV
|
Template #2 |
Issue #3
May 26, 2017
|
date is wrong, missing on original page and not needed for this page
|
Template #2 |
Issue #4
May 26, 2017
|
caption in wrong place, should be under cover
|
Template #2 |
Issue #5
May 26, 2017
|
need formatting
|
Template #2 |
Issue #6
May 26, 2017
|
static page, need IV
|
Template #5 |
Issue #1
Jun 5, 2017
|
The page is one of the main articles on the website.
|
Template #4 |
Issue #2
Jun 8, 2017
|
IV is not generated for target page
|
Template #4 |
Issue #3
Jun 8, 2017
|
IV not generated for target page
|
Template #4 |
Issue #4
Jun 8, 2017
|
news but No Instant View available
|
Template #9 |
Issue #1
Jun 13, 2017
|
missing ling by author
|
Template #9 |
Issue #2
Jun 13, 2017
|
эта подпись относится не к одному снимку, а ко всей статье
|
Template #9 |
Issue #3
Jun 13, 2017
|
Caption not formatted correctly
|
Template #12 |
Issue #1
Jun 13, 2017
|
Caption not formatted correctly
|
Template #10 |
Issue #1
Jun 13, 2017
|
it is author photo
|
Template #15 |
Issue #1
Jun 15, 2017
|
Picture, even though being the photo of an author, is in the body of the aricle because the author wanted it to be there.
|
Template #13 |
Issue #1
Jun 15, 2017
|
Picture, despite being the photo of an author, is in the body of the aricle because the author wanted it to be there.
|
Template #13 |
Issue #2
Jun 16, 2017
|
Explaining my point about why I think the author's picture has to be preserved in this case: 1. It is located in the body of an article meaning that the author wanted it there. And it makes sense considering the fact that an author talks about herself in an article. 2. Rudimentary content here is the SECOND picture of an author (also highlighted) which traditionally goes after an article. Repetition of the picture justifies that author wants it to be there.
|
Template #15 |
Issue #2
Jun 16, 2017
|
ADMIN: Propose to reconsider the decision about preserving the author's picture based on these points: 1. It is located in the body of an article meaning that the author wanted it there. And it makes sense considering the fact that an author talks about herself in an article. 2. Rudimentary content here is the SECOND picture of an author (also highlighted) which traditionally goes after an article. Repetition of the picture justifies that author wants it to be there. 3. Obviously, changing the author's actual work would be illegal.
|
Template #13 |
Issue #4
Jun 17, 2017
|
Could be inserted with higher quality.
|
Template #19 |
Issue #1
Jun 17, 2017
|
Page should be generated
|
Template #17 |
Issue #1
Jun 17, 2017
|
This is static page
|
Template #18 |
Issue #1
Jun 17, 2017
|
This is static page
|
Template #17 |
Issue #2
Jun 18, 2017
|
this is author photo
|
Template #18 |
Issue #2
Jun 18, 2017
|
it is author photo
|
Template #19 |
Issue #2
Jun 18, 2017
|
it is article page
|
Template #19 |
Issue #3
Jun 18, 2017
|
it is target page
|
Template #17 |
Issue #3
Jun 18, 2017
|
telegram channel missing.link is on full page
|
Template #18 |
Issue #3
Jun 18, 2017
|
missing telegram channel
|
Template #15 |
Issue #3
Jun 18, 2017
|
Needs formating
|
Template #15 |
Issue #4
Jun 18, 2017
|
Article needs IV
|
Template #15 |
Issue #5
Jun 18, 2017
|
Article needs IV
|
Template #20 |
Issue #3
Jun 19, 2017
|
Link is missing.
|
Template #22 |
Issue #2
Jun 19, 2017
|
Could be inserted with higher quality.
|
Template #20 |
Issue #4
Jun 19, 2017
|
Formatting could be done better.
|
Template #21 |
Issue #1
Jun 19, 2017
|
link not removed
|
Template #21 |
Issue #2
Mar 2, 2018
|
Valentin: Здравствуйте, в этой статье неправильно указан год рождения Серафима Роуза, он родился в 1934 году.
|