this is an article on the pravda.com.ua

this is an article on the pravda.com.ua

this is an article

2 authors, but author_url only one. Better miss author_url

Author is missed

Pretty caption.

I like this here:
https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/pravda.com.ua/template15/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flife.pravda.com.ua%2Fcolumns%2F2017%2F06%2F17%2F224762%2F

WHERE?

WHERE?

IV missing

Cover image missing

No IV for news articles.

Please add published time to instant view template

not generated

Should be a <figcaption> not a regular <p>

Image caption, not paragraph

instant view is not generated

IV is not generated

missed date

wrong date and author

page not load

page not load

page not load

lost cover

cover don't load

Unnecessary block

Cover image

<b>

Missed published_date

Need to remove

<related>

<related>

Need to remove

IV not generated for target page

does not belong to the article

It's related articles

does not belong to the article

Accepted issues - 4, but template not rejected... https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/pravda.com.ua/template31/

Template doesn't work on this page

Missing IV

Source of information is missing.

IV not generated for target page

IV not generated for target page

The continuation of my answer to https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/pravda.com.ua/template58/issue2/
----
Your tamplate: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/pravda.com.ua/template67/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pravda.com.ua%2Fnews%2F2017%2F07%2F9%2F7149102%2F
At all case exist issues.

Ou, looks like date is missing :/

Missing IV.

Does not work with /health/ URL. It should be fixed.

Date is missing

Author is missing

"6.5.1 Subdomains

Subdomains that present content in a similar way to the higher level domain must be supported."

Source: https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-5-1-subdomains

http://vybory.pravda.com.ua looks exactly like http://pravda.com.ua

No description for related articles

No IV for this page

No IV for this page

missed the second author

missed the second author

missed the second author

This should not be supported, entire bottom part is broken.

This should not be supported, entire bottom part is broken.

This should not be supported, entire bottom part is broken.

This should not be supported, entire bottom part is broken.

Missing page.

I am terribly sorry for duplicating the issue, but I feel this should be discussed, because you are misleading people.

In your answer you said that's 2017 post, it's not - this is post from 6 days ago. Also, this and all other weird fkups that they did in code took me ~10 lines of code to fix without endangering anything. Please stop using lazy excuses and find a way to fix this.

I can show you the code after this domain gets a winner if you are interested. I hope I did not sound rude, sorry if I did.

IV doesn't generated for target page.

It's optional, but telegram-channel is missing.

Doesn't marked as related

There is no Telegram channel nowhere in the source of any subdomains. Author hardcoded this value. If they ever change their Telegram channel or add one to their subdomain with this template it will always show wrong one.

Rudimentary content not removed from author

Missing author

Missing second author, wrong cover

This should not be supported, this is an index of articles about candidates.

This should not be supported, this is an index of articles about candidates.

missing caption

This should not be used as a cover.

This 4 entire paragraph are missing in this template. Should be located between those two images, but they cannot be found in this template at all.

This is supplement issue for the previous one:
Yes, this is a post from 2017, but your code broke it, there is nothing wrong with it and you can break future posts as well. Just because I found a post from 1.5 year ago, which is not far man, we ain't in 2039, but it still does not mean there is none from 2018 or even 2019.

missing main messages

Cover is wrong.

This should not be presented like this. Those are not that essential to bring it right before potential reader's eyes. Those are just thesis of the article. My template handles this better and does not make this element so annoying to look at.

missed author

Those captions are all broken. My templates handles this better.

lost figcaption

There is unsupported widget here (open original page). Whole thing should be either marked as unsupported or duplicated link should be removed.

admins recommend use not more 5 related items

Facebook post not properly parsed.

Isn't this annoying? Sending last minute issues. I will stop if you stop, so we can have a fair battle.

This whole block is unreadable now, all paragraphs are joined together.

Unfortunately, according to latest rules:
"Only one header may be present for the block of related articles at the end of the page."
also:
"You may leave “inline” related links in the middle the article. If you do, these <related> blocks must not have headers (unless the header contains critical information)."
Sorry :/ I had to fix that myself as well.
https://instantview.telegram.org/checklist#6-3-2-1-formatting-related-articles

Hey Serhii, I know that the thing with related wasn't 100% fair and I waited quite a while after new rules were released before I changed mine. Sorry if you feel cheated, I do have few more valid (I think) issues though, so I will use one now.

I don't think you should use <hr> here. It makes the content much less readable. On original page it's only used to mark the answer of interviewed person (or whoevs).

Must be removed.

Related articles are missing.

caption is missing

Hey Serhii, well, congrats, I think you won it after all this time. Sorry I was harsh, but I just felt that you are wasting the time with those last minute issues and also it was a bit disrespectful for all the time we put into it.

After all I think you deserve the win, congrats.

I don't think it's a valid issue, just a minor cosmetic thing and it's not the point of me sending you the issue - however this doesn't look good as pullquote, I'd recommend to use <details> for it and perhaps leave it as opened, especially that we already use pullquotes for something different.

<details> isn't suitable formatting for this block: key theses must be first and obvious content in the article. They're not additional content, that can be hidden.

It's better to format this block as simple paragraphs and separate it from the main content with <hr>

<details> isn't suitable formatting for this block: key theses must be first and obvious content in the article. They're not additional content, that can be hidden.

It's better to format this block as simple paragraphs and separate it from the main content with <hr>

this page should be genrated

this page should be genrated

IV generated for non-target page

I'm afraid this will never end. :(