i think first picture on sciencedaily.com is always cover, not just a picture, because it is static and always on top of the article
IV always look better with cover

No credits for the image. No link to the source of information. The author should be always "Sciencedaily" not the source of the information, as they note: "Note: Content may be edited for style and length"

Image caption and image credit are missing

The subtitle is missing

The subtitle is missing

Divider and empty paragraph were not removed

No author specified

no IV

no IV

no IV

Rudimentary content not removed

Missing image

Missing image

caption doesn't exist

author "Sciencedaily" is not specified in the source hence should be remove

missing content, please add it

it doesn't support related articles

it doesn't support related articles

some information block is deleted

this blocks are displayed incorrectly

date

this blocks doesnt contain any information

this block are genereted automatically, they must be deleted

unncessary block

Why is source thrown inside a paragraph like that?

I think the share column is to remove.

this block are not necessary

"<related> containing one of <h1> – <h6> tag as header of the block and <a> tags with the attribute href containing a URL of related article."
I think this is part of the related article block.

Empty row with (removed) share buttons is unnecessary and should be removed

Missing the last paragraph of the article.

This article is a page with a scientific term description. The first paragraph is a term definition.

The term definition is highlighted in the original source, but not in IV (is not distinguishable from ordinary paragraphs).

The other two templates handle it better.

Links to Related Topics (do not have IV, since they are categories and contain dynamic lists of article) and Related Terms (static, have IV) are mixed under one "Related Stories" block

In original source, related blocks "Related Stories", "Related Topics" and "Related Terms" are separated. The same should happen in IV.
Also, category articles from "Related Topics" should be removed because they do not have IV.

related topics should be removed and just related stories must exist

Missing the header for Related Articles block that is present on original page

Is it appropriate to use tag <footer> to format notes in the original text? Is it an issue or not?

Missing "Cite This Page" block.

References are important part of scientific articles and should be preserved.

Check: https://instantview.telegram.org/contest/sciencedaily.com/template29/issue4/

Scientific term pages (like this) are static and have IV.

For each term there is a static list of related terms. A reader may be interested in reading the definition for other related terms, so it's better to preserve this static block in a <related> tag.

A very good initiative, to make available research papers in an instant view. Thank you for doing so. The article is also very interesting.