Why published time stay in author block?

Where url on author?

Miss figcaption

Should be parsed

Should be parsed as well

Should be parsed

Subtitle can be parsed

Original url has unsupported content

I think this page should be parsed and unsupported content should be removed

MAY BE THIS PLAYERS?

The page should be parsed and unsupported content should be removed

It's a block with a quote, and it's better to use the <blockquote>

It's a block with a quote, and it's better to use the <blockquote>

It's a block with a quote, and it's better to use the <blockquote>

It's a block with a quote, and it's better to use the <blockquote>

Why u think that u can use second photo for cover?

There's a suitable image directly below the title.

https://core.telegram.org/instant-viewFH2t53Hsdf8654HHERGN_TEST1#6-3-cover-images

Missed cover
@match("url[(](.+)[)]", 1): //div[has-class("cover")]/@style
<img>: //div[has-class("cover")]
@set_attr(src, @style)
cover

it's poll not list

commentaries should be deleted (section)

This is Blockquote

Blockquote

Duplicate article img

Duplicated images.

Author didn't remove comment section. This is non-static section and new comments can be added or updated. So, it should be removed.

Incorrect processing.

Incorrect processing.

About page is service page. And IV shouldn't generated for this page

Incorrect processing.

it's qoute

should be a qoute

no iv - can be parsed

no iv - can be parsed

no iv - can be parsed

no iv - can be parsed

Incorrect processing.

This is contact page.

This is contact page, data may change.

This is contact page, content may change.

U can fix audio and take IV

U can fix audio and take IV

U can fix this youtube video

Youtube video can be parsed

Youtube video can be parsed

Youtube video can be parsed

There are no links to mobile applications.

The solid text.

Author is missed title and this image isn't cover on this page

That's looks like simple paragraph without quotes, then it would be better do not use blockquote tag.

That's looking like simple paragraph without quotes, then it would be better not use blockquote tag

It's a block with a quote, and it's better to use the <blockquote>

It's a block with a quote, and it's better to use the <blockquote>

It was necessary to break a whole block of quote? It's does'nt look natural.

Slider is missing, please use the tag <slideshow>

Audio source is now supported content

Divider is missing on source page

Duplicate article img

It should work, just change source of iframe vimeo

It should work, just change source of iframe

It should work, just change source of iframe

It should work, just change source of iframe

It should work, just change source of iframe

It's not a cover.

It's the 2-columns table (actually).

Very bed view of table(

Duplicate image

Duplicate image

It should be a caption of the blockquote

Duplicate image

Duplicate image

Where this img, u can see that in original page this img is cover and img in post?

Hm, this is blockquots

Where is video?

Where is video???

There is no information about the channel on the About page and on the current page.

The table on this page can be displayed.

Very bad view of table

Miss video

Miss video

The Video on this page can be shown.

The quote is not in its place.

Maybe it should be removed.

Video is missing.

Video is missing.

Video is missing.

Look at this table, i think its very bad view

В России кино будут показывать с 10 сентября. Кто у вас источник информации?